what about it?:S some people say it's bm but some dont care. i rather dont care as long its 1 point not max lol.

obviously maxed since it's a very solid skill for jabbers

i can't see why it'd be banned o_o

Eh if it was maxed, that would be a little cheap IMO. Like a barb maxing zerk.. unfair advantage. 1 Point should be allowed though.

hmm i thought of this since a lot of matchs gets cancel a lot lol i think user should be allowed to rechallenge that person. since it wasn't completed challenged but huge down fall a lot of people going abused like crazy will clog up ladder but also they cant ask for extend just straight 3 days if not finish they need wait 48 hours to rechallenge that person o.o

This post was edited by Neko on Feb 21 2011 12:29pm

Not sure what everything there means, but if I got it right... you are saying that after a match has been canceled, a user should be able to immediately rechallenge the person who they just had to cancel with?

What would be the point of canceling the match? As of now, canceling allows someone to be free of a pending duel that isn't going to happen due to scheduling conflicts, thus, enabling them to challenge someone else who is easier to arrange a time with.

Is that even what you were saying? lol

This post was edited by Christian_X on Feb 21 2011 02:44pm

pretty much but ya recently a lot of matchs been cancel due of conflicts scheduling >< sucks for some people cuz they wanna move up then its cancel cuz they having problems meeting with other person; cant mark as dodge cuz it's unright for them.

This post was edited by Neko on Feb 21 2011 03:25pm

I agree. I feel that this is simply an issue of courtesy. The challenger should be more aggressive and open with his or her schedule, while the person challenged should make some effort to accommodate the challenge, such as replying to the first PM with an exact time frame of availability. I think most challenges that are canceled occur when people are lazy and simply say "maybe tomorrow" instead of actually setting up a time frame / window to get it done.

thats why i figure, they should issue one rechallenge vs that person and no extend just straight 3 days if they won't finish its they have to wait 48 hours to rechallenge that person.

Yeah exactly.

I'd have to agree with Jess here. It would keep things moving, and I don't see a reason why not. The whole reason why matches are ruled as cancels is because the council believe there was a good reason that the challenge didn't take place, so giving those people another chance right away seems like the logical thing to do.

This post was edited by Biglouy on Feb 21 2011 03:41pm

was thinking no extending since it's one more chance if we put extending also they just going abuse it lol and clog up ladder :X