im probably gonna restart these ladder rules in non ladder cause restricting charms is pathetic.

lmk if anyone will join i might make it a private ladder so we wont have any problems with randoms.

This post was edited by Delta9TetrahydroCannabinol on Mar 22 2011 02:06pm

110 resist just from small charms against a blizzer in sorc vs sorc doesn't seem fair
why limit the ladder to only 2 of the 3 elements that a sorc can choose to use? if you let people use 10x 20-11's it will make cold sorcs unusable in sorc vs sorc because its way too easy to stack them without sacrificing anything. charm cap rule makes it balanced, thats just my 0.02$

svs is restricted to 2/3 elements anyway, blizzys are unusuable and even the 2-3 ppl EVER that have managed to pull it off at a high level were all amazingly good and still had a rough time with it

and all limiting which charms you can use does is favor ppl with a bigger bank roll... ive have 200/86 with 3k+ life and 500 cold stack before, AND still had a free ring to use raven if i wanted depending on specific rules (and i always used 20/5's)
allowing charm switching makes it possible for ppl to compete who cant drop multiple thousands on sc's

saying 400+ res means so sorb is fine, that makes sense, but restricting how someone gets there is silly

imo

thats why the rule is under 399 resists + raven = gm ( with a vita blizzer @ 10k ib thats 6-8 hits depending on life, and i tank about 6-8 fbs depending on how fast they hit )

and if you have over 400 you cant use raven. but this way tanks alot less.

i shouldnt be punished because i have the fg to spend on 3x sets of charms.

these rules are perfect and i cant wait to add all my nl gear to the blizz.

if you have 150 resists just from inventory though, you wont need to focus as much on getting resist from gear. you can aim for more damage or speed based gear

remember once you completely stack over the -res from cold sorc, she's only hiting 9-10k iceblast and 14-15k blizzard and at 105 fcr. compare this to a fb sorcess using a spell that shoots twice as fast, 6k more damage and generally more HP.

i agree fb'ers are superior but no amatuer is gonna play on a blizz and win.

there is always a way to beat someone in this game.

and getting resists on gear is pointless and a waste of fg when i can buy a ammy with 2 sorc 10 fcr 27 strength 37 life 87 mana and my ring 10 fcr 16 str 30 life 75 mana.

get those stats with all resists your talking 10k each.

different strokes for different folks. i wont be the one to tell you theres one way to do things.

well i supposse we're all entitlted to opinions

i simple believe it would be more fair if a superior class had to make sacrifices in order to more fairly duel a weaker class

even with the sacrifices made, the fireballer will still have the advantage in the end.

i just stand for making the game as balanced as possible ^^

agreed these rules make it very fair for all 3 classes which is proven in our top 8.

your top 8 from what i saw last was 8 for 8 on vita fires. borriiiinngggg

~~ correction 5/8 vita fire, 1/8 es fire, 2/8 lights.

This post was edited by Delta9TetrahydroCannabinol on Mar 22 2011 02:56pm

well there are only 2 registered cold sorc users on that ladder
1 of them happens to be #9
what i'm saying is, someone with a cold sorc might not want to register because its extremely difficult as it is for them even though other sorcs can only have 50 res from scs
it would be even harder if their opponent had an extra 75 res just from small charms

the nl ladder is huff.

already kicked me out for telling fubar his rules were wack. so i will be making a variation of it coming soon after the reset.

skill will always be superior to item possession. proven by all the tals sorc's this ladder gods speed my friends.