my apologies didnt see that you were. my point is if you're lettign #8 challenge #5 cuz #6 is on vacation you have to let #7 challenge #4. Thought you were rejecting him cuz of 3 spots not because you were in a challenge.

IMO broodwich should be able to challenge 3 spots ahead of him. Everyone else can challenge two people, why can't he? Just take out the number of the vacationer from the ladder so it'll be 1 - 5, 7 - 20.

BTW Challenge broodwich

why let 2 people pass the rules when only one has the problem. if i let 7 challenge 3 ahead why not 9-20 too?

this is a temporary fix for someone who has family shit. i think you can handle it.

oh and adding

this rule was just thrown out here on the spot, i see none of the free dodge pass in any of your rules
so i will argue this till it is made right.

lets get this strait u just made that shit up a hour ago that u have to be 2 spots under the afker to be able to skip him. thats a fucked rule when u say pretend hes not there

you don't seem to get what we are saying. the person that is on vacation is within two spots of him. I'm not sayign anything about anyone past spot #8 and I'm not saying take the guy on vacation off. vacations are fine its not a big deal. I'm saying in broowich's case the guy is 1 spot ahead of him he should be able to challenge 2 people to move up, and that would make his second person you.

your not getting what i'm saying. acting like he is not there meaning DO NOT CHALLENGE HIM. he is #6 your are #7 qqnuddles is #8.

two people in front of qqnuddles are #7 and #6*.

two people in front of you are #6 and #5. AND you can challenge #5 so whats the problem?

your looking for special treatment in the wrong place.

This post was edited by Delta9TetrahydroCannabinol on Jan 13 2011 10:00pm

This.

can i test my sorc now vs cold?

svs//gm

but yet u give a inactive dueler special treatment?

why dont u challenge broodwich and win then he can get the 3 spots ahead.