challenge gohan.

<< UPDATED LADDER>>

#1 Rebekah: Arthos

#2 Besh: BULL

#3 Braum: Gohan

#4 millerhighlife: OhPieceOfCandy

#5 Transplant: XAxeX

#6 Lacapitale: Rios

#7 Killermcknight76: Rolltide

#8 Zidesef: ZIDESEF

#9 Baldbastard: Copenhagen

#10 Cjarvis: Gmbvb

#11 mick1507: Steroids

#12 Zidesef: Charles_manson

#13 Baldbastard: Blessed_mother

#14 1nceaday: Soulthief

#15 Busta_nutz: Busta_nutz

#16 Juventus: Etruscan

#17 Darksnipe: Arnie

Challenging (Read this before you issue any challenge):

1) You are allowed to challenge up to 2 ranks above you.
2) You must PM the other party about the challenge.
3) Challenge will be first to 7.
4) The winner of the challenge is allowed to challenge immediately after winning.
5) If you lose a Challenge you must wait 24 Hours to re-challenge the same person.
6) 3-Day Dodge Rule (Afk, no-reply, no-show = auto-loss) 2 consecutive "dodges" = removed from Ladder. Post in this thread if you need an extension (of 48 hours max).
7) It is your responsibility to keep the admins up to date on the status of your duel by posting here (Win/Lose/Null/Dodge/Request Extension).
8) If you are experiencing trouble meeting up with a challenge, please pm an admin and inform them (if we don't know that you have worked something out with...Arthos to duel in 4 days, we are going to invoke dodge/null rules).

Current/Last updated/ Old Rules Located Here -->http://s13.postimage.org/n8lmg35hz/BvBRules.jpghttp://s13.postimage.org/n8lmg35hz/BvBRules.jpg9

Pending Challenges:

#10 Cjarvis: Gmbvb Vs #8 Zidesef: ZIDESEF (11/16/14)(7:42pm)(48 hour extension)
#16 Juventus: Etruscan Vs #15 Busta_nutz: Busta_nutz (11/18/14)(12:44am)
#2 Besh: BULL Vs #1 Rebekah: Arthos (11/19/14)(4:01pm)
#6 Lacapitale: Rios Vs #4 millerhighlife: OhPieceOfCandy (11/19/14)(10:32pm)
#9 Baldbastard: Copenhagen Vs #7 Killermcknight76: Rolltide (11/19/14)(9:59pm)
#5 Transplant: XAxeX Vs #3 Braum: Gohan (11/20/14)(11:54am)

Tournaments:
^^Accepting donations for tournament prizes!^^
All tournaments will be announced accordingly as public posts. Please check here for future tournament updates.
2014 Gladiator Challenge
^Sign up NOW! Only accepting the first 32 applicants. ^
Registration ends 11/22/14.

☆★Previous Tournament Winners★☆
Winner of Tournament #4: Eth: Arreat / Runner up: Klax12 / Third place: Rebekah: Arthos
Winner of Tournament #3: Klax12: XII_two / Runner up: Rebekah: Arthos
Winner of Tournament #2: Evil_plots: Butcher / Runner up: Eth: Arreat
Winner of Tournament #1: Rebekah: Arthos / Runner up: Bingtu: MrBingles

Inactive Barbs:
Nede: Ugoh
Bizzar: Williambowers
evil_plots: Butcher
Peen: Balrog
Blazen: Crazy
sickoflifeale: Ba-Sickoflife
Eros: Gangster
K_3_N: Free_Porn
Toughguy_TJ: TJ
Bingtu: MrBingles
Klax12: XII_two

Current Admins:

Rebekah
Besh

This post was edited by Rebekah on Nov 20 2014 12:55pm

may we please have an extension,
should get this done asap,

I wish to propose a vote to amend one of the rules AND to add one other:
Majority vote wins per item (each one has a chance to be applied separately)
This vote is open to the current 15 accounts on the ladder. (1 vote per account)
Votes are final and will not be changed (please consider both sides prior to voting)
Please vote on both issues at the same time in this format: #1: Yes/No #2: Yes/No
This poll will close 11/30/14 @ 12:00 midnight.
If you do not vote, your vote will be nulled.

#1 Amendment:
Current rule: "5) If you lose a Challenge you must wait 24 Hours to re-challenge the same person."
Proposed Amendment: If you lose a Challenge you must wait 12 Hours before posting another challenge and 24 Hours to re-challenge the same person.
Reasoning: This would reward the winner with the chance to duel +1 or +2 places above him (whichever is open) and other winners under him to challenge up the ladder. (this is more of a reward of winning). The winner should have the right to challenge for whichever position he wants (within range of 2) first.

#2 New Rule:
New Rule: In the case that you own more than 1 barb on the ladder (max of 2), You are unable to challenge yourself.
Reasoning: In the case that you were able to challenge yourself it would 1) tie up the ladder and 2) become a free place swap for 1 of your barbs. Essentially challenging yourself would be as if u challenged +4. (example: you own barbs #10 and #8, you challenge yourself awarding a position swap and then go on to challenge +2. This would be the same as #10 vs #6 (+4). I propose the you are unable to challenge yourself and must challenge around your other barb. (example: You own #10 and #8, In order to advance your #10 above your #8 you would have to challenge positions #9 and then #7 (as would be in accordance to the +2 rule).

Rebekah: Arthos:

Besh: BULL:

Braum: Gohan:

millerhighlife: OhPieceOfCandy:

Transplant: XAxeX:

Lacapitale: Rios:

Killermcknight76: Rolltide:

Baldbastard: Copenhagen:

Cjarvis: Gmbvb:

mick1507: Steroids:

Zidesef: Charles_manson:

1nceaday: Soulthief:

Busta_nutz: Busta_nutz:

Juventus: Etruscan:

Darksnipe: Arnie:

#1 yes #2 yes

yeh ofc i agree to both.
It used to be 1 full day before other admins changed it when i quit.


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=42157614&f=276&o=0 my old rules

Challenge rule:
The winner of a challenge has priority in his next challenge. The person who loses will have to wait 1 full day before challenging again, allowing the others to challenge him, to avoid those situations when people challenge immediately after their duel, consequently not giving a chance to the lower ranked players to move up.
This rule applies for re-challenges as well, meaning u don't have to wait 3 days to re-challenge the same opponent, you can do it after 1 day.


Forfeit rule:
After 5 days, no matter what the situation is, a duel is voided and if deemed necessary, the win is granted to one of the opponents, at the admin's discretion (if someone was stalling the duel, and the other was available and ready etc.).


This post was edited by BeSh on Nov 20 2014 05:16pm

Im not on the ladder currently but rule #1 should definitely be implemented.

I'm also not on the ladder (yet), but both rules seem very reasonable. I don't see why either of them should get voted down.

i wish i had my barb still

i miss this atmosphere, and my cool golden arreat helm

tempted to buy a lvl 99 barb and gear just to reminiscence the good times.

rule 1 no rule 2 is a no brainer so yes.