d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > East N-l Gm Ww Barbvsbarb > By Besh
Prev1191319141915191619173424Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 7,367
Joined: Feb 13 2005
Gold: 1.25
Oct 16 2014 11:27pm
I'm willing to bet that zidesef will vote no as well, I really don't see this hybrids coming into fruition
Member
Posts: 12,651
Joined: Jun 3 2010
Gold: 23,061.00
Oct 17 2014 12:10am
Hybrid Vote
Voting will be restricted to the current 19 individuals on the ladder
Your opportunity to vote will expire on Sunday 10/26/14 @ 10:00pm EDT (at which point you will be issued a null)
Only 1 vote per person may be submitted. Votes may not be changed...consider both sides carefully!
Post your vote in this thread
2 in favor (20%) / 7 against (70%) / 1 Null (10%)


#1Rebekah: Arthos No, do not allow hybrids

#2 Lacapitale: Rios No, do not allow hybrids

#3 Bingtu: MrBingles Yes allow hybrid runewords

#4 millerhighlife: OhPieceOfCandy

#5 Busta_nutz: Toniy

#6 Baldbastard: Copenhagen No, do not allow hybrids

#7 Zidesef: ZIDESEF

#8 Gruntstyle8: Blessed_mother

#9 Zidesef: Charles_manson

#10 ShredHead_Trev: XAxeX

#11 mick1507: Da_niglit No, do not allow hybrids

#12 Bizzar: Williambowers

#13 Klax12: XII_two: Yes allow hybrid runewords

#14 Eth: Arreat No, do not allow hybrids

#15 DaLiNkWeNT: DaLiNkWeNT No, do not allow hybrids

#16 Besh: BULL

#17 1nceaday: Soulthief

#18 evil_plots: Butcher Null, I dont care either way

#19 Peen: Balrog No, do not allow hybrids

I'd (Klax12: XII_two) like to take a vote on whether or not people would like to allow hybrid runewords. The prices have significantly reduced since they were reduced into the market and I feel that the original reason they were banned has been resolved.

I will edit this post to tally who votes what. You must post in this thread!

Thanks!

This post was edited by Rebekah on Oct 17 2014 12:20am
Member
Posts: 6,874
Joined: Dec 4 2007
Gold: 6,877.50
Oct 17 2014 06:10am
I can understand why people would NOT want hybrid weapons, the dmg modifiers from CB and OW% could be game changing coupled with the +400 dmg.

That being said I think hybrid armors specifically would be a neat idea. I don't want to theorycraft in thread to give away my secrets but... Fort of CoH has a ber in it for 8% dr. One could opt to use a ber in their helm or shield to hit the 50% DR cap and start to use rare OW belts. The 10% OW from belt could let people swap forts to Duress and swap dracs for rends along with a KS instead of a Grief. for 103% OW and 73% CB to build around dmg modifiers instead of titan hits.

This is what I was referring to in my original post on giving us more options in our builds. That is jsut one example....

This is the main reason I was driving for the changes. The rune changes in armors I feel aren't significant enough to merit a ban. Fort of stone has 1980 defesne, hardly any change to CtH%.

Thoughts?

This post was edited by klax12 on Oct 17 2014 06:14am
Member
Posts: 18,866
Joined: Jun 27 2006
Gold: 440.00
Oct 17 2014 06:16am
I feel should not allot hybrids in the ladder my vote is no
Member
Posts: 589
Joined: Mar 4 2013
Gold: 68.00
Oct 17 2014 07:21am
No hybrids
Member
Posts: 6,874
Joined: Dec 4 2007
Gold: 6,877.50
Oct 17 2014 07:24am
Quote (millerhighlife @ 17 Oct 2014 08:21)
No hybrids


well since 1 person said they didnt care either way this vote offically makes it 50% ppl vote no.

Case close, no Hybrids

Thanks for considering guys!
Member
Posts: 57,513
Joined: Jun 24 2006
Gold: 900.00
Oct 17 2014 09:04am
Quote (klax12 @ Oct 17 2014 08:24am)
well since 1 person said they didnt care either way this vote offically makes it 50% ppl vote no.

Case close, no Hybrids

Thanks for considering guys!


Doesn't look like bvb is ready for this...

I was gonna vote yes too.. I liked the idea of a change. We could have tested at least.

But yeh democracy has spoken!
Member
Posts: 6,874
Joined: Dec 4 2007
Gold: 6,877.50
Oct 17 2014 09:10am
Quote (BeSh @ 17 Oct 2014 10:04)
Doesn't look like bvb is ready for this...

I was gonna vote yes too.. I liked the idea of a change. We could have tested at least.

But yeh democracy has spoken!


for sure, maybe in the future we can re-evaluate, in the mean time someone needs to start making grief of beasts and SA fort of chains. ;)
Retired Moderator
Posts: 31,584
Joined: Oct 14 2007
Gold: 1,702.00
Trader: Trusted
Oct 17 2014 11:00am
i tested and this is what it came in results

Reg griefz >> G.O.D
reg fort >> Fort of stone
Reg grief cb ...tied with G.O.D cb they both barely hit
Member
Posts: 6,874
Joined: Dec 4 2007
Gold: 6,877.50
Oct 17 2014 11:11am
Quote (DaLiNkWeNT @ 17 Oct 2014 12:00)
i tested and this is what it came in results

Reg griefz >> G.O.D
reg fort >> Fort of stone
Reg grief cb ...tied with G.O.D cb they both barely hit


LOL, results obviously flawed if grief CB was hitting less than griefz. Statistically Griefz and Grief CB hit the exact same. Also, assuming you are fighting a SA barb your chance to hit using a GOD is a 0.73% less (with block factored in) but you gain 25% OW- Which ticks for 59.52 dmg/ second at lvl 99.
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1191319141915191619173424Next
Add Reply New Topic