yeah you were one of the few you actually worked with me and kept a cool head. thanks ^^

so you're admitting that given the circumstances, you would cheat to win?

thank you for partially admitting to using a well during a duel that you were losing

no thats not what he's saying.

I have a few options:
I. Null the duel.
Problem with this is mark is up 3-1 without that kill.

II. Cancel that one kill.
Problem with this is this shows in the future that as long as you well, I'll just cancel that one kill. If I don't, I'll be accused of inconsistency. So if it's 4-4 and someone's 1 hp and they well, all they say is, k I well! redo!

III.
Leave it at 4-1.
Problem with this is there is a half empty well. Dan shows his life less than 50%. Commerce was in that game but he didn't touch well. I was also in that game (Hyuna) briefly but I never left town. Even though Mark claims to have never been hit, the well can be used for mana. I am neither confirming nor denying Mark drank out of the well. Just that the well has been drunk out of and even to a full hp person it provides benefits. No need point accusations because neither side has absolute proof.

There is no absolute right option but to think in the future of the duels, option #1 is best in that this shows that you can't drink out of the well to get a nulled kill. This will deal with the unknown well. It is rather unfortunate for Mark to have to start over but to think for the other duels, I believe this is the best option.

One could provide argument that Option II is the most fair. But this is only limiting your view of the scope to this one duel. In the future, if someone wells, and the opponent knows they did it on purpose to null the duel, the weller can cite this example and use this to his advantage.

Option three is just too messy... there will be too many accusations without full on proof.

If you all agree with my decision, I will stay moderating the ladder, meaning you will support my decisions.
If you all disagree with my decision, I can no longer moderate as you will disagreen with my decisions.

Thoughts?

i mean just party with each one of them since there's two of u, not hard to hp watch

and i highly doubt (or at least hope) ppl would bm in a fun/no fg ladder since if u ever get caught you're banned and even if u dont get caught wtf do u gain?...a spot? let'em live with themselves being that dumb

imo keep going at 3-1

This post was edited by SickT on Mar 11 2011 08:34pm

i have always agreed with you desiciions as well as u have always agreed with mine

i think its safe to say i win by default and none of u will ever get to #1 now that i am there
this ladder is now over

i may not like unfound so people will think this is biased BUT...welling in a gm ladder is bm regardless of life/circumstances..it is bm therefore he should lose the duel..but i also see what hon is saying since he can't prove that he hit the well..but blunder has been more than known to lie about dueling circumstances to help benefit himself..even with clear proof..hard to trust a liar

in real life, people will do anything to gain a better position if they can get away with it.
in this ladder, the goal is to gain a spot and move up. if they can get away with it, they will try. im speaking generally, not pinpointing.
we have to limit our scope to the ladder and the ladder only. not whether what they gain is significant or not.

vasto's a multi of mulits so that doesnt say much for his case either

and hitting a well/shrine by accident should just count towards losing that one duel



im just saying having two meds in game for every duel is unrealistic. there's a point where you're just gonna have to trust ppl and realize its a game and let ppl do what they're gonna do...karma will catch up to them whether its them getting caught eventually or w/e

This post was edited by SickT on Mar 11 2011 08:44pm