d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Ghost Assassin Ladder East Soft Core Non Ladder
Prev1146147148149150479Next
Closed New Topic
Views: 88839Replies: 4783Track Topic
Member
Posts: 5,502
Joined: Aug 18 2010
Gold: 177.00
#1471
Oct 2 2011 07:05pm
check now
Member
Posts: 4,183
Joined: Dec 12 2010
Gold: 0.00
#1472
Oct 2 2011 08:13pm
Quote (Decarnate @ Oct 2 2011 06:39pm)
You lost your last duel so in this instance you fall into OpenWound's previous spot.


Seems silly, rather than displacing CanaanBallZ and I both down a spot while putting Mike in #6. But if that's how things work, that's how things work...

I challenge CanaanBallZ.
Member
Posts: 19,257
Joined: Dec 31 2008
Gold: 7,802.00
#1473
Oct 2 2011 08:26pm
Quote (KGBJSP @ Oct 3 2011 02:13am)
Seems silly, rather than displacing CanaanBallZ and I both down a spot while putting Mike in #6. But if that's how things work, that's how things work...

I challenge CanaanBallZ.


simple just fight back to where you were,
I agree though, i'd much rather have people challenge one spot below like how i made it to 5th..
I never challenged anything past 1 spot below
Member
Posts: 4,183
Joined: Dec 12 2010
Gold: 0.00
#1474
Oct 2 2011 08:59pm
Quote (acdc5 @ Oct 2 2011 09:26pm)
simple just fight back to where you were,
I agree though, i'd much rather have people challenge one spot below like how i made it to 5th..
I never challenged anything past 1 spot below


I'm not saying I don't like being able to challenge two spots ahead; this prevents stagnation and keeps things interesting, particularly once one has reached, mm, the appropriate position for one's skills/build.
Swapping spots with the winner, though, is advancing the middle guy for free. Doesn't make sense to me... but my logic is not everyone's logic.
Member
Posts: 29,067
Joined: Feb 13 2005
Gold: 150.00
#1475
Oct 2 2011 09:27pm
Quote (KGBJSP @ Oct 2 2011 10:59pm)
I'm not saying I don't like being able to challenge two spots ahead; this prevents stagnation and keeps things interesting, particularly once one has reached, mm, the appropriate position for one's skills/build.
Swapping spots with the winner, though, is advancing the middle guy for free. Doesn't make sense to me... but my logic is not everyone's logic.


Well that technicality originates from a certain Azn. *Ahem* I have no issue changing it if everyone else agrees. This will force inactive players down in rank.
Member
Posts: 4,183
Joined: Dec 12 2010
Gold: 0.00
#1476
Oct 2 2011 09:41pm
Quote (KGBJSP @ Oct 2 2011 09:13pm)
Seems silly, rather than displacing CanaanBallZ and I both down a spot while putting Mike in #6. But if that's how things work, that's how things work...

I challenge CanaanBallZ.


5-3 again after about 12 total duels. XD I advance to #7.
Member
Posts: 36,952
Joined: Nov 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 10%
#1477
Oct 2 2011 09:50pm
Quote (KGBJSP @ Oct 3 2011 02:59am)
I'm not saying I don't like being able to challenge two spots ahead; this prevents stagnation and keeps things interesting, particularly once one has reached, mm, the appropriate position for one's skills/build.
Swapping spots with the winner, though, is advancing the middle guy for free. Doesn't make sense to me... but my logic is not everyone's logic.


the guy in middle does not advance at all i take your place because i beat you and you go too where i was its why its called defending a spot :P and why would i challenge 1 spot ahead if ic an challenge two? my goal is too get too #1 spot so if i can challenge too spots ahead till rank 5 im going too :P
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
#1478
Oct 2 2011 09:51pm
Quote (Decarnate @ Oct 2 2011 11:27pm)
Well that technicality originates from a certain Azn. *Ahem*  I have no issue changing it if everyone else agrees.  This will force inactive players down in rank.


its a habbit, its how they're been doing it since i first ran the ladders so i just stuck to it. but ur right... it is sorta unfair for middle guy to get a "free rank" i suppose. cuz if 7 beats 5.... why does 5 have to go below 6.... he was originally still higher. so i see what hes saying

if mike and no one else objects, we can change the rankings on next update.


Quote (OpenWound @ Oct 2 2011 11:50pm)
the guy in middle does not advance at all i take your place because i beat you and you go too where i was its why its called defending a spot :P and why would i challenge 1 spot ahead if ic an challenge two? my goal is too get too #1 spot so if i can challenge too spots ahead till rank 5 im going too :P


u can do it up to #3 now.

This post was edited by Azn Masta on Oct 2 2011 09:57pm
Member
Posts: 4,183
Joined: Dec 12 2010
Gold: 0.00
#1479
Oct 2 2011 10:16pm
Quote (Azn Masta @ Oct 2 2011 10:51pm)
its a habbit, its how they're been doing it since i first ran the ladders so i just stuck to it. but ur right... it is sorta unfair for middle guy to get a "free rank" i suppose. cuz if 7 beats 5.... why does 5 have to go below 6.... he was originally still higher. so i see what hes saying


Yeah. Imagine if we allowed anyone to challenge anyone else; #8 could challenge #1 and they'd have to switch positions if #1 lost. Would that be fair? Because it's the same thing on a smaller scale. :bonk:
Member
Posts: 49,932
Joined: Apr 30 2004
Gold: 39,662.00
#1480
Oct 2 2011 10:25pm
Quote (KGBJSP @ Oct 3 2011 12:16am)
Yeah. Imagine if we allowed anyone to challenge anyone else; #8 could challenge #1 and they'd have to switch positions if #1 lost.  Would that be fair? Because it's the same thing on a smaller scale.  :bonk:


theres a reason to why we only allow 2 challenges at a time

but then again to back up my old theory. that number 8 would NEVER beat the #1 guy. so its ok :)
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1146147148149150479Next
Closed New Topic

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact