d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Level 49 2v2 Tournament > Sunday June 21 - 15h Cet
Prev11314151617Next
Add Reply New Topic
Views: 2373Replies: 162Track Topic
Member
Posts: 2,137
Joined: Jul 1 2003
Gold: 49.00
#141
Jun 21 2015 01:19pm
Quote (Obstgarten @ 21 Jun 2015 20:10)
maybe its a good idea to unbann bo weapons & bo skillers, but maximum 1 point in bo for barb sorc / teams (or lvl 5 or 10, i dont know)
another thing could be to ban enchant for sorc because the micro stun of firedmg is very mad in that matchup


or simply allow low lvl cta
Member
Posts: 10,494
Joined: Nov 22 2006
Gold: 2,061.92
#142
Jun 21 2015 01:24pm
i dont had any pala in mld but i think this tournament with 85 fire res was kinda more fair than usually?
Most palas prefer using tri auras instead stacking two and focusing their positioning and spot gaming/protecting

=> When hammer does this right hdin bow team are kinda unrushable.
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
#143
Jun 21 2015 01:27pm
Quote (Obstgarten @ 21 Jun 2015 21:10)
maybe its a good idea to unbann bo weapons & bo skillers, but maximum 1 point in bo for barb sorc / teams (or lvl 5 or 10, i dont know)
another thing could be to ban enchant for sorc because the micro stun of firedmg is very mad in that matchup


we want to keep rules as simple as possible so having a special build just for barbs playing with sorcs is not possible.
bo weapons grant +6bo without any sacrifice so those are out of question imo.

banning wcs or banning whistans are the only two realistic options i see and so far i favor the first.
Member
Posts: 10,494
Joined: Nov 22 2006
Gold: 2,061.92
#144
Jun 21 2015 01:30pm
Quote (harabec @ Jun 21 2015 08:27pm)
we want to keep rules as simple as possible so having a special build just for barbs playing with sorcs is not possible.
bo weapons grant +6bo without any sacrifice so those are out of question imo.

banning wcs or banning whistans are the only two realistic options i see and so far i favor the first.


it is more about the playstyle of palas aswell... do you really think it is hard to avoid fbs as pala?....
i think the way you did 80 fire res with barb bo for pala and 85 res without barb team is really enough,
Give me a good bow and equip a hdin/libby and i will do a video how to play ... incase this 2n2

This post was edited by googh on Jun 21 2015 01:31pm
Member
Posts: 35,455
Joined: Jan 24 2007
Gold: 1,460.37
#145
Jun 21 2015 01:57pm
Quote (googh @ 21 Jun 2015 21:30)
it is more about the playstyle of palas aswell... do you really think it is hard to avoid fbs as pala?....
i think the way you did 80 fire res with barb bo for pala and 85 res without barb team is really enough,
Give me a good bow and equip a hdin/libby and i will do a video how to play ... incase this 2n2


xD!!
Member
Posts: 10,494
Joined: Nov 22 2006
Gold: 2,061.92
#146
Jun 21 2015 02:00pm
Quote (kaspermusen @ Jun 21 2015 08:57pm)
xD!!


^^
it is true those guys don't think about allow more frw on bow instead xDDDDD
in that special 2n2

This post was edited by googh on Jun 21 2015 02:00pm
Member
Posts: 9,663
Joined: Dec 30 2014
Gold: 0.00
#147
Jun 21 2015 02:29pm
cg to team britannia :)
Member
Posts: 56,444
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 594,121.52
#148
Jun 21 2015 02:59pm
Quote (googh @ Jun 21 2015 09:00pm)
^^
it is true those guys don't think about allow more frw on bow instead xDDDDD
in that special 2n2


I think you missed where we dont want complex rules for specific matchup's, also in terms of frw the frw limits for bowa speficially, they were done expressly because bowa was deemed too strong in 1v1. i dont think that frw limits are the issue to be honest, and again, as per GMTennis, CG to team britannia for winning. no need to nerf them just because they won...

This post was edited by ferdia on Jun 21 2015 02:59pm
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
#149
Jun 21 2015 03:18pm
Quote (ferdia @ 21 Jun 2015 22:59)
I think you missed where we dont want complex rules for specific matchup's, also in terms of frw the frw limits for bowa speficially, they were done expressly because bowa was deemed too strong in 1v1. i dont think that frw limits are the issue to be honest, and again, as per GMTennis, CG to team britannia for winning. no need to nerf them just because they won...


very true and i believe we can agree that chum+jeebus will do very well whatever the rules.
i just think that it's not cool when certain teams can win with one player being more or less afk (based on my own experience as sorc player).

not saying that this video is representative but it does seem somewhat relevant to the topic (from a random tvt a while back):



This post was edited by harabec on Jun 21 2015 03:30pm
Member
Posts: 9,663
Joined: Dec 30 2014
Gold: 0.00
#150
Jun 21 2015 03:22pm
Quote (harabec @ Jun 21 2015 10:18pm)


that ama ^^

ty for hosting, hopefully i got time for the next one :)
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev11314151617Next
Add Reply New Topic

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact