d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > East N-l Gm Ww Barbvsbarb > By Besh
Prev1120312041205120612073423Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 3,292
Joined: May 10 2010
Gold: 260.04
Jul 5 2011 09:43am
Quote (byracki @ Jul 5 2011 12:24am)
I wish I could challenge BACarnage
but I'll be away from home starting tomorrow until July 11th.

I might be able to find time to get to an internet connection and do quick updates
if not, be big boys and survive without me :)


Dreams81 ignored most of my PMs, sigh... I'm challenging him again then.
Member
Posts: 35,873
Joined: May 26 2003
Gold: 19,350.00
Jul 5 2011 10:13am
UnV has responded to a pm 48 hours ago
i believe he is on holiday
iso to move on to next duel
please advice byracki
Member
Posts: 29,768
Joined: Jul 17 2007
Gold: 3,597.95
Jul 5 2011 11:53am
Quote (BACarnage @ Jul 5 2011 10:43am)
Dreams81 ignored most of my PMs, sigh... I'm challenging him again then.

In this case, BACarnage gets moves up from the nulled duel.
no score given for a nulled duel.

Quote (dark_dragonzzz @ Jul 5 2011 11:13am)
UnV has responded to a pm 48 hours ago
i believe he is on holiday
iso to move on to next duel
please advice byracki

He accepted the challenge in the 3 day timeframe. If he is afk from jsp for a holiday or something like that, post a screenshot of him saying so and than you can challenge up. If not, you two have until July 7th to complete this duel. If he is away for several days in a row when you are not, you will be awarded the win.

This post was edited by byracki on Jul 5 2011 11:58am
Member
Posts: 29,768
Joined: Jul 17 2007
Gold: 3,597.95
Jul 5 2011 11:57am
<< UPDATED LADDER>>

(40-17)[394-349]
(11-11) [132-113]
(13-12) [185-188]

4.) xxwpvpwxx: Tigerbalm89 (Solo) (10-4) [114-85]
5.) Kishkoli: atmaweapon (Condemned Nation)(7-4) [66-68]
6.) Armedes: peden5281 (Solo) (6-6) [118-117]
7.) GDN: uNv (Solo) (3-2) [30-37]
8.) BA-Carnage: BACarnage (BA) (2-0) [0-0]
9.) pyramidhead: dark_dragonzzz (Silent Hill) (4-1) [44-23]
10.) UkrainianLegend: dreams81 (Liberated) (2-1) [28-22]
11.) byracki: byracki (Guardians of the Vault) (1-1) [2-7]
12.) iQQ: xxtimxx727 (Solo) (0-1) [0-0]
13.) BA-sickoflife: sickoflifeale (Solo) (0-0) [0-0]
14.) Vampir: LoRdNuKe (One) (36-9) [457-310]
15.) MaximumDamage: aWsHy (Heroes) (0-0) [0-0]

MIA:
XX.) Massacred: dcahill08 (Monumental) (1-3) [22-33]
XX.) stim: tuner (Guardians) (0-0) [0-0]
XX.) Duel-McLovinBvB: FULL_CLIP (Solo) (0-3) [1-7]
XX.) SnS: SnS (ROK) (0-1) [0-0]

Pending Duels:
dark_dragonzzz vs uNv ~ Jul 2
aWsHy vs sickoflifeale ~ Jul 2
amyot1974 vs dalinkwent ~ Jul 2

Finished duels:
byracki vs dark_dragonzzz ~ 7-2 darlk_dragonzzz
Tigerbalm89 vs amyot1974 ~ Nulled.
BACarnage vs dreams81 ~ Nulled. BACarnage 'wins'

*Admins of the Ladder:
RoccoSlut/Tom, mike979/Mike, Byracki/Eric


**CLICK HERE TO READ THE RULES!


This post was edited by byracki on Jul 5 2011 12:18pm
Member
Posts: 29,768
Joined: Jul 17 2007
Gold: 3,597.95
Jul 5 2011 12:09pm
I am leaving until the 11th as I posted. I should be able to get to a computer or phone or something and keep this at least half-ass updated.

A few thoughts before I leave on this ladder procedures:

If someone you challenge leaves the ladder = You win their rank, but no score is given

If someone you challenge dodges you (no 3 day pm response) = You win their rank and get 1 win while he gets 1 loss

If someone you challenge responds in 3 days to your challenge, but the duel gets nulled:
You (challenger) at fault for the delay = no rank change, no score given
Him (higher rank) at fault for the delay = rank change, no score given (Nulled duels shouldn't affect score, only rank)
Both at fault for the delay = no rank change, no score given

This seems how it should be logically. Let me know any thoughts you have.
(this isn't exactly the way this has been done in the past... should this be the way we do it?)

This post was edited by byracki on Jul 5 2011 12:10pm
Member
Posts: 3,292
Joined: May 10 2010
Gold: 260.04
Jul 5 2011 05:58pm
I'm challenging
6.) Armedes: peden5281 (Solo) (6-6) [118-117]
Member
Posts: 21,324
Joined: Feb 6 2008
Gold: 31,000.00
Jul 5 2011 08:06pm
Quote (BACarnage @ Jul 5 2011 05:58pm)
I'm challenging
6.) Armedes: peden5281 (Solo) (6-6) [118-117]


Armedes doesn't have time for bvb when I pm'd him. Pm him to make sure if correct he needs to be placed in the MIA group.
Member
Posts: 20,000
Joined: May 18 2008
Gold: 0.00
Jul 5 2011 08:07pm
Quote (byracki @ Jul 5 2011 02:09pm)
I am leaving until the 11th as I posted. I should be able to get to a computer or phone or something and keep this at least half-ass updated.

A few thoughts before I leave on this ladder procedures:

If someone you challenge leaves the ladder = You win their rank, but no score is given

If someone you challenge dodges you (no 3 day pm response) = You win their rank and get 1 win while he gets 1 loss

If someone you challenge responds in 3 days to your challenge, but the duel gets nulled:
You (challenger) at fault for the delay = no rank change, no score given
Him (higher rank) at fault for the delay = rank change, no score given (Nulled duels shouldn't affect score, only rank)
Both at fault for the delay = no rank change, no score given

This seems how it should be logically. Let me know any thoughts you have.
(this isn't exactly the way this has been done in the past... should this be the way we do it?)


hey since you seem to be the only one updating here i can volunteer to help update as well. the only thing that would screw me up is how the top3 are done. lmk.

This post was edited by LoRdNuKe on Jul 5 2011 08:09pm
Member
Posts: 21,324
Joined: Feb 6 2008
Gold: 31,000.00
Jul 5 2011 08:55pm
Do the other admins do anything?
Member
Posts: 3,292
Joined: May 10 2010
Gold: 260.04
Jul 5 2011 09:17pm
Quote (atmaweapon @ Jul 5 2011 10:06pm)
Armedes doesn't have time for bvb when I pm'd him. Pm him to make sure if correct he needs to be placed in the MIA group.


PM sent, no reply so far :(
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev1120312041205120612073423Next
Add Reply New Topic