d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Legit Dueling > Op Dpk- > Update
Prev111121314Next
Add Reply New Topic
Views: 3747Replies: 135Track Topic
Member
Posts: 31,863
Joined: Sep 23 2007
Gold: 2,906.35
#121
Jan 1 2010 08:38pm
these ladders lol, i've seen a few people be #1 on them who few years back were considered terrible by everyone on lad but their couple friends
Member
Posts: 40,297
Joined: Nov 8 2005
Gold: 1,200.00
#122
Jan 2 2010 12:00am
Quote (KillersDream @ Dec 31 2009 04:07pm)
I've already pointed out the "A total of 451 poison is allowed" rule. You agreed with me and said that it should state that it applies to charms only.
I've already pointed out that this rule set doesn't allow 85% res if it comes from two items (waterwalk + vex). Others have agreed with me that this is pointless and likely unintentional.

You want some more? I'll point out the more obvious ones.

  • "May use mana pots if es% is under 80%." The rule set says you may use mana potions if you're es% is below 80, but it never says anything about not being able to use mana potions if es% is 80 or higher. In other words, mana pots are always allowed, though I doubt that is what is intended.
  • "Fire golem + dwarf star is allowed (not vs. fire trappers)." Is this rule supposed to mean that dwarf star + fire golem is gm, but hotspurs + fire golem isn't? According to these rules, both would be gm. This rule seems to be placed here as if to prevent hot spurs + fire golem, but it doesn't actually do that. If that isn't the intent, this rule is pointless.
  • "Dual claw assassins can use one wisp/raven/dwarf." Is this supposed to also mean that things like a LoLo circlet are intended to be bm?
  • "2 ravenfrosts are allowed (its a build). but then you are not allowed over 100+ cold stack." Does 100+ cold stack mean 175+ res after hell penalty, or 100+ res after hell penalty?
  • "1 ravenfrost allowed on stacking amazons (250+ cr stacked)." See above.
  • "Tele psn zons are Banned from any team duels." Someone could try to say that a telezon that does anyone poison damage is a "tele psn zon". A definition is needed? What about a hybrid poison bowa?
  • "Using a resistance aura counts as a piece of absorb when it has 2 or more base points." You realize that there is a passive bonus for auras, and you don't have to actively be using them, right?
  • "Resist cold is allowed (1 raven only)." Is this supposed to imply that 2 ravens are allowed in other circumstances? Also, this allows for 20% sorb and 95% res, surely that is not intended?
  • "Resist Fire + Waterwalks are allowed (Cannot use any other sorb)." You don't allow hotspurs, but you allow this which can be worse?


The rule set is also full of redundancy, for example there are many places where it says hot spurs are not allowed even though it is explicitly stated that no more than 85% max res is allowed.

9 Reasons why you're an idiot.
  • If it says you can only mana pot under 80%es then obviously you can't mana pot if you're over? Get with it retard.
  • Fire golem rule is pointless imo
  • again anyone with half an ass will tell you this OBVIOUSLY means that's the only absorb allowed
  • "Cold Stack" stack meaning resists over your max on screen -_-
  • See above is right.
  • Tele psn zons meaning tele zons with an inventory of poison charms
  • Standard rules apply. Max res capped at 85 for paladins. The USE of the aura (like using it!) is fine if it's a single point. If there's more than 1 point, then it counts as your absorb. Don't be dumb :)
  • If you knew anything, you'd know max cold res doesnt do fuck all unless you have like 500+ cold res. and Zealers/chargers can use 2 ravens
  • Standard rules apply retard. 85 max.
successfully shut the fuck up'd.

This post was edited by Ty- on Jan 2 2010 12:01am
Member
Posts: 2,601
Joined: May 3 2005
Gold: 136.40
#123
Jan 2 2010 02:07am
Quote (Ty- @ Jan 2 2010 12:00am)
If it says you can only mana pot under 80%es then obviously you can't mana pot if you're over? Get with it retard.
Obviously? The rules don't forbid it so obviously you CAN mana pot. A loophole is a loophole buddy, that's what you asked me to point out.

Quote
again anyone with half an ass will tell you this OBVIOUSLY means that's the only absorb allowed
It obviously means that, yet it does not say it anywhere? Cool story, bro.

Quote
"Cold Stack" stack meaning resists over your max on screen -_-
The rules do not define it, and would anya res count? A clear and standard definition needs to be made.

Quote
Tele psn zons meaning tele zons with an inventory of poison charms
So is a telebowzon with 1 poison damage bm? lol

Quote
Standard rules apply. Max res capped at 85 for paladins. The USE of the aura (like using it!) is fine if it's a single point. If there's more than 1 point, then it counts as your absorb. Don't be dumb :)
Funny that you say that, because it specifically says that a raven is allowed to be used in conjunction with the cold aura and it isn't restricted to 1 point.

Quote
If you knew anything, you'd know max cold res doesnt do fuck all unless you have like 500+ cold res. and Zealers/chargers can use 2 ravens
You're wrong about that 500+ number, but your statement isn't even relevant. You think someone should be able to have over 75% res (yes, after cold mastery) while simultaneously having 20% sorb?

Quote
Standard rules apply retard. 85 max.
The rule specifically says that waterwalks can be used in conjunction with the aura. Based on the style of all other rules, these class specific rules override the standard rules. Using your logic, necromancers can't use hotspurs because standard rules apply.


Quote
successfully shut the fuck up'd.
Kid, you better watch yourself and realize that you're talking to a legend. I've had a larger impact on d2 than you could imagine. I could also have your diablo accounts deleted np. You asked for loopholes, you got them. Do yourself a favor and give up.
Member
Posts: 4,782
Joined: May 17 2009
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 100%
#124
Jan 2 2010 02:22am
Quote (KillersDream @ Jan 2 2010 03:07am)
Kid, you better watch yourself and realize that you're talking to a legend. I've had a larger impact on d2 than you could imagine. I could also have your diablo accounts deleted np. You asked for loopholes, you got them. Do yourself a favor and give up.


Import me some items bro
Member
Posts: 21,465
Joined: Feb 19 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
#125
Jan 2 2010 02:29am
im better looking than any of u check out the profile if u wann b jealous
Member
Posts: 78,723
Joined: Nov 30 2008
Gold: 493.00
#126
Jan 2 2010 02:38am
Quote (tizzel @ Jan 2 2010 08:29am)
im better looking than any of u check out the profile if u wann b jealous


nice wrinkles, i bet they build character
Member
Posts: 40,297
Joined: Nov 8 2005
Gold: 1,200.00
#127
Jan 2 2010 02:44am
Quote (KillersDream @ Jan 2 2010 03:07am)


Kid, you better watch yourself and realize that you're talking to a legend. I've had a larger impact on d2 than you could imagine. I could also have your diablo accounts deleted np. You asked for loopholes, you got them. Do yourself a favor and give up.


Well apparently you're a dumb nerd with no life to argue the wording of some rules that are beyond obvious..

Please have my account *Rickor locked/deleted
i would love to see this LOL
Member
Posts: 2,601
Joined: May 3 2005
Gold: 136.40
#128
Jan 2 2010 02:48am
Quote (Ty- @ Jan 2 2010 02:44am)
Well apparently you're a dumb nerd with no life to argue the wording of some rules that are beyond obvious..

Please have my account *Rickor locked/deleted
i would love to see this LOL
Kid, you're lucky I have an extremely high code of ethics, otherwise I would.

By the way, I like how you avoided the fact that I countered each of your points. GD
Member
Posts: 40,297
Joined: Nov 8 2005
Gold: 1,200.00
#129
Jan 2 2010 04:53am
Quote (KillersDream @ Jan 2 2010 03:48am)
Kid, you're lucky I have an extremely high code of ethics, otherwise I would.

By the way, I like how you avoided the fact that I countered each of your points. GD


You didn't counter shit dude..
all you did was whine about wording :\
Member
Posts: 2,601
Joined: May 3 2005
Gold: 136.40
#130
Jan 2 2010 05:19am
Quote (Ty- @ Jan 2 2010 04:53am)
You didn't counter shit dude..
all you did was whine about wording :\

The rules consist entirely of words you dumb fuck, of course my problems were with the words. Holy fuck you're stupid.
Go Back To Legit Dueling Topic List
Prev111121314Next
Add Reply New Topic

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact