Yo, this tour I'll play all duels with rattle just to check what is better for me and my playstyle.
So all these duels could be great fun for me, but InSorteDiaboli has right.
In next tour maybe I'll make movies from these duels. You will see that some of you never attack first, just wait for opponent.
If he doesn't attack first you make some stupid ww's in strange sides of map.
Imo it's not a tactic. I think that I have much more free time than most of you and it's not a problem for me to play with you one duel 30 minutes, but some of us doesn't have so many time. It's rly boring.
Sometimes I win, sometimes I lose, but mostly I play one duel in about 1 minute or faster. Ofc I like to win, but I respect your free time, that's why I don't like to use defplay all the time.
I'm not sure how to play bvb to be fair. Maybe duels without ww, and with other attack could be more fair ^
All these tournamets give me nice fun from this game and I'll join to next ones.
Maybe it will be cool to make one new rule. For example: (we have duel A vs
player A has about 5-10 seconds to attack his opponent, than players B has about 10 seconds to attack his opponent, than player A... etc. etc.
I'll say it one more time. All these duels give me nice fun, but this defplay is annoying like cold dmg for some of us. It would be cool to make one new rule with sense if it's possible.
depends when ranging or not, its easier for bh to get more crit hits usually more strength. so bh vs bh is always faster and u can still outskill opponents.
when using naga or exec i dont mind how long ti takes but they can also range and attack without getting caught heavy, duels as a ranger is like a gnat jabbing at a elephant, so u need to make ur opponent attack you.
exec vs exec is like bh vs bh.