Quote (Belarathon @ Sep 3 2021 02:19am)
In my opinion, VT vs VT is an absolute bullshit duel which is barely above melee.
That being said, agreeing to a VT vs VT duel and then using hammers is not legit.
Although I do believe that KaseyK is a better dueler than KappaDpride in every regard; this win doesn't seem legit.
I hope that anyone can agree with the above statements. At least anyone who duels.
Not that I am anyone or have anything to say here. But it doesn't hurt to throw your 2 cents out into the void!!!
Looking forward to the rematch and I would put my own +775/15%ed mage plate enigma ON THE LINE *****THAT'S RIGHT AN ENIGMA***** if both parties wanted :]
I mean all of the points you make are valid. But that's not the problem here.
Put simply:
You and I wager, but we disagree on a ruleset.
I SA you.
This mod interprets what they think is right and stipulates a new rule on a ruleset (clearly not defined in the stated ruleset he linked)
and now i am forced to rematch under a ruleset, based on the opinion of a mod, which heavily favors the enemy.
I never agreed to iniate a wager under said new ruleset, there i am not accountable to uphold the agreement of the wager, as the wager agreement has been altered.
This is fundamentally not okay, and sets a bad precedent imo