Quote (thesnipa @ Feb 1 2021 01:43pm)
its pretty simple, 99% of east NL is happy to duel under rule sets they might not agree with and just have fun. and you're the 1%.
so go make your own tourney. come up with a ruleset and ill be happy to post 12 essays on how its not perfect.
?! i absolutely loved asylum's b-tier event he had before. it was my favorite tourney ever. you are acting like im a critic or something when i was simply discussing rules.. because the topic was called rule discussion topic?
the first time i discussed rules about the b-tier event and even then i was being treated weirdly by asylum as if i was talking about shit too much, but i feel like the best way to come up with a solid ruleset is through long discussion.
i will be hosting an event for ted and its going to be 1 s tier char per team 2v2, and i welcome any and all knit picking on rules in the topic that will be for discussing rules, because i am not a douche bag and i understand that the more things r discussed then the closer to perfect they will become.
the b-tier event had a really super long discussion topic thread, where me you asyium and trevor were the 4 main contributors to the conversation, and funnily enough that was the best event i took part in, go figure..
once i started being literally flamed for adding my opinions into topics, the events started falling to shit and not one has had more signups that took part since. though michaels fpk tourney was very nice, and funnily enough it was discussed by people without any flaming happening because michael respected my dislike for a 4 class only event.
if you actually think the way asylum has chosen to treat me plays no part in any of this, you need to go re-read the 30 zvz ladder topic. so you can realize that im not the only one who sees how asylum has been treating me over discussing rules in a rule discussion topic.