d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > ==[ Euro Sc Ladder Lvl 30 Tour Rule Discussion ]== > Lets Start Organising A Lvl30 Tournament
Prev18910
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 12,302
Joined: Jul 2 2005
Gold: 455.00
Warn: 10%
Jul 2 2011 09:16am
dennis,
nothing against u but,
when i follow here ur thread, then i guess that u get more and more subjective and not objective.
it looks like more and more that u try to set the rules in ur own way
but sorry, u are not the one who set the rules alone.
maybe a poll about some rules are the better way.
Member
Posts: 24,778
Joined: Mar 15 2008
Gold: 7,745.55
Jul 2 2011 09:25am
things like wsg were always bm, but it never appeared in a rule

and its not possible to put it into a rule, same as you cant put a rule vs defwhoring which is also bm.

but thats what a good player makes, to play fair and gm even if there is no rule against it

u will always lame players who do wwwwwwwwwwwwwsg and defwhore all the time, but thats more a nonladder then a ladder problem imo
Member
Posts: 32,140
Joined: Oct 29 2005
Gold: 100.00
Jul 2 2011 09:27am
Quote (UcF-Sunyc @ 2 Jul 2011 17:16)
dennis,
nothing against u but,
when i follow here ur thread, then i guess that u get more and more subjective and not objective.
it looks like more and more that u try to set the rules in ur own way
but sorry, u are not the one who set the rules alone.
maybe a poll about some rules are the better way.


I said everywhere and every time that the issues that matter will be set by a poll (where only the duelers get to vote that compete)
the polls will be held around the closing date of the tournament so I can contact every dueler that has signed up.

I fully agree that it are not my rules, but the rules of the duelers. I'm down with any vote.

The only thing I'v raised my voice against is the forbidden switching for 10 seconds rule because IMO its fucking nuts. but thats the only rule I'm fully against.

any other rule I'm down with. as long as the majority is in favour.

Quote (Hellskin @ 1 Jul 2011 20:38)
Debate on the following points is still open:

Replenish limits
WSG
PLR limits
max fire res
max light/cold stack


Quote (Hellskin @ 29 Jun 2011 18:47)
But if the guys that join have problems with 25 repl I'm willing to put it up to vote.


Quote (Hellskin @ 13 May 2011 17:45)
I'm not against using a switch item with 25% plr. But I'll go with a majority vote


To be honest, suny. I'm trying everything I can to prevent people from accusing me for what you just did.

Accusing me of making a tour with rules that favour me.

I already expected the accusation because it happens EVERY SINGLE TIME someone organises a tournament. But now that it comes from you it hurts my feelings.

This post was edited by Hellskin on Jul 2 2011 09:34am
Member
Posts: 56,255
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 584,571.66
Jul 2 2011 09:48am
on nonladder @ mld wsg has been excessively abused. switching slots for the purposes of creating sync is banned. even that wording failed because people didnt understand it. the wording from harabec, which i agree with is as follows:

switching more than once without using an attack is forbidden. (u can shoot ga, switch to shield, switch to bow, shoot ga, switch to shield ...)

Dennis, i stopped posting rule discussions and have done it all privately recently. rule discussions on Jsp is a waste of time and effort imo. (too many arguments).

This post was edited by ferdia on Jul 2 2011 09:50am
Member
Posts: 19,916
Joined: Oct 8 2006
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Jul 2 2011 09:55am
Quote (ferdia @ Jul 2 2011 03:48pm)
on nonladder @ mld wsg has been excessively abused. switching slots for the purposes of creating sync is banned. even that wording failed because people didnt understand it. the wording from harabec, which i agree with is as follows:

switching more than once without using an attack is forbidden. (u can shoot ga, switch to shield, switch to bow, shoot ga, switch to shield ...)

Dennis, i stopped posting rule discussions and have done it all privately recently. rule discussions on Jsp is a waste of time and effort imo. (too many arguments).


Good rule,

Replenish limits - 22~, 10 es sorc
WSG-ferdia post
PLR limits - main gear
Member
Posts: 24,778
Joined: Mar 15 2008
Gold: 7,745.55
Jul 2 2011 09:58am
Quote (ferdia @ Jul 2 2011 03:48pm)
on nonladder @ mld wsg has been excessively abused. switching slots for the purposes of creating sync is banned. even that wording failed because people didnt understand it. the wording from harabec, which i agree with is as follows:

switching more than once without using an attack is forbidden. (u can shoot ga, switch to shield, switch to bow, shoot ga, switch to shield ...)

Dennis, i stopped posting rule discussions and have done it all privately recently. rule discussions on Jsp is a waste of time and effort imo. (too many arguments).


sadly harabec abused wsg in the most duels we had
Member
Posts: 88,226
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 48,034.00
Jul 2 2011 10:03am
Quote (addesmile @ Jul 2 2011 03:55pm)
Good rule,

Replenish limits - 22~, 10 es sorc
WSG-ferdia post
PLR limits - main gear


seems fair
Member
Posts: 32,140
Joined: Oct 29 2005
Gold: 100.00
Jul 2 2011 10:26am
Quote (ferdia @ 2 Jul 2011 17:48)
on nonladder @ mld wsg has been excessively abused. switching slots for the purposes of creating sync is banned. even that wording failed because people didnt understand it. the wording from harabec, which i agree with is as follows:

switching more than once without using an attack is forbidden. (u can shoot ga, switch to shield, switch to bow, shoot ga, switch to shield ...)

Dennis, i stopped posting rule discussions and have done it all privately recently. rule discussions on Jsp is a waste of time and effort imo. (too many arguments).


I fully agree with the wsg rule.

and I WILL put out votes via PM once the sign up has closed.
Member
Posts: 19,933
Joined: Mar 24 2011
Gold: 127,795.00
Jul 14 2011 07:51am
well, even if its almost too late:

im in for a change that ls trappers/hdins shouldnt be allowed to have 85fres. duelling 85fr ls trappers with banned wsg is unbalanced imo.
all in all im not too happy with the 85rule, but i understand that this rule once applied as es sorcs could else tank 75fr barbs..

Member
Posts: 24,778
Joined: Mar 15 2008
Gold: 7,745.55
Jul 14 2011 12:43pm
Quote (Kleistos @ Jul 14 2011 01:51pm)
well, even if its almost too late:

im in for a change that ls trappers/hdins shouldnt be allowed to have 85fres. duelling 85fr ls trappers with banned wsg is unbalanced imo.
all in all im not too happy with the 85rule, but i understand that this rule once applied as es sorcs could else tank 75fr barbs..


a fire es sorc will tank anything with 75 fr

but well its true, is hard to kill invi hdins but with some pracitse u will be able to do that,too

This post was edited by CarloAnalo on Jul 14 2011 12:47pm
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev18910
Add Reply New Topic