imo its only imba vs barbs, but if barbs are allowed to run away until it ends i dont see any problem in it

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

but no amp rule should be removed anyway

maybe i'd w8 for a bit better armor for those gowdly jools.
ofc that's nice allready with those 2 socs, but maybe 60+ed or some life, or base -req would be cool.

Although it is a shame to see such good jewels on a melee, base req wouldn't need -req from jewels :3
iirc 11+ max is already better than 20%ed

wouch everything this man said and then some/10

pls find a 500+ def 2Os -30 req ancient and then suggest that
Those jewels are hardly a waste in that armor....well...save for the 4 str. NN bladefury bias.

I'm not actually suggesting the following, just using it as an example:

Why not ban amp as long as the weapon has 300 or less ED? I certainly think that 150ED is more useful than 5%ctc amp. Where would you draw the line with banning useful affixes spawning on items?

But then if someone finds a 450ED/20ias/20max/2os/-30req bow, it should it be banned by this logic of limiting overpowered items. It's certainly better than a 300ED/5%ctc amp bow, which is the max that would be allowed...

wouch everything this man said and then some/10

oh yeah banning amp is retarded

Lets ban more then 400ed aswell , regars