d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > 11th Lvl 49 Mld Tournament > 2nd Edition...
Prev1555657585967Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 9,691
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Gold: 0.00
Dec 17 2010 03:07am
give his spot to baboun then?
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Dec 17 2010 03:10am
can't do that. thats not how a tournament works. he qualified for the last 16, he was able to duel at that time, it may be disruptive to promote baboun and disruptions are the last thing that i want. conscious of the time constraints involved as well as everything else. think of it like a tennis player injured, the opponent gets walk over, you can't promote the next best player. ideally savagesick would have been TKO'd from the tournament prior to the KO stage (which would have meant baboun would have qualified).

also, invisi will be TKO'd saturday night if he has not completed his duel by then.

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 17 2010 03:16am
Member
Posts: 14,476
Joined: Oct 14 2006
Gold: 0.01
Dec 17 2010 03:30am


I hope I'll beat derpate and meet harabec in the final xD
Libby vs barb would be easy win :P
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Dec 17 2010 03:35am
harabec still has to beat sutcliffe (i think). and you still have to beat derpate.

also,

i'm aware that some people want a rule where the paladin (libby) uses zero dr vs barb. however, thats not what the current rule is. i dont think i will ever put in such a rule to be honest. you have to factor in that there are barbarians on the realm that have way better swords then oaths who do not currently compete in the tournaments, and not everyone plays the same.

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 17 2010 03:36am
Member
Posts: 14,476
Joined: Oct 14 2006
Gold: 0.01
Dec 17 2010 03:58am
Quote (ferdia @ Dec 17 2010 10:35am)
harabec still has to beat sutcliffe (i think). and you still have to beat derpate.

Yes, but last time harabec beat sutcliffe 5 - 0, so probably he have nice chance to win again.
And I'm sure I can do better than I did vs derpate, at least I'll try :P

Quote (ferdia @ Dec 17 2010 10:35am)
also,

i'm aware that some people want a rule where the paladin (libby) uses zero dr vs barb. however, thats not what the current rule is. i dont think i will ever put in such a rule to be honest. you have to factor in that there are barbarians on the realm that have way better swords then oaths who do not currently compete in the tournaments, and not everyone plays the same.


Well, I don't care too much, since I'm not barb player :P I'm not using dr anyway, because it decreases your mana pool obviously and makes duels even more boring.
Better swords have nothing to do with this anyway. Pala shouldn't get hit unless he is sure that he can tank low life barb easy. If he gets hit, he deserves to lose :P

This post was edited by kukiFBK on Dec 17 2010 03:59am
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Dec 17 2010 04:01am
Whatever! on your head be it!

technically, if anyone gets hit, they deserve to lose.

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 17 2010 04:02am
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Dec 17 2010 06:05am
gona test some new things with kuki for barb vs libby

sutcliff i'm up for killing you(r nerves) once more ;)
Member
Posts: 8,610
Joined: Aug 25 2010
Gold: 0.00
Dec 17 2010 07:04am
Quote (kukiFBK @ Dec 17 2010 11:58am)
Yes, but last time harabec  beat sutcliffe 5 - 0, so probably he have nice chance to win again.


he beat my will ;)

Quote (harabec @ Dec 17 2010 02:05pm)
sutcliff i'm up for killing you(r nerves) once more ;)


im up later today ^^
Banned
Posts: 1,042
Joined: Dec 2 2010
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 30%
Dec 17 2010 10:08am
merry christmas



This post was edited by Imbaboun on Dec 17 2010 10:08am
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Dec 17 2010 10:43am
harabec 5 - 1 sutcliffe
he gave up after 3-1
t4d
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev1555657585967Next
Add Reply New Topic