Quote (MADIrishGunner @ Jul 17 2020 11:46am)
i personally do not care at all if tearhaunch is/was a good option, the vigor is not only for using to synch, maxing it allows your hammers to go up in damage aswell as charge, its a synergy for both.
if someone wanted to have pissing contests with adam the rest of the ppl were more than capable of going to a new game and continuing the tvt, shit it would probably have been better without hdins neways. but i dont see the pt behind making the most important pally skill unaccessable just because people didnt like confrontation, id rather just get the confrontation out of the way and deal with it when they come than to completely cripple a class, thats like making 120frw the max for zons or making es sorces be 65 block, its just ridiculous and is only fair if you plan to cripple every class.
from what you are saying it just sounds like there was a period of time where a bunch of people who hate paladins had free reign to torture users who enjoyed the class with their other non paladin characters. lol.
i mean firstly, we were all like 14 at the time. conflict resolution wasnt exactly a feasible goal lol.
secondly, this never crippled pallys. hard pt vigor, dont hard pt vigor, even run 0 rep. theyre still an A tier build. a good player on an hdin using even just shard and a steel clash can 5-0 many other LLD builds with ease.
and even on a pally with no dmg charms and a staff medi instead of part you can still rek people with charge.
allowing pallys hard pt vigor for more charge dmg takes them from an A tier char to A+ tier char rly.