tele vs sorc , it's nice idea

i can do sorcs with current rules.

not that it wouldnt be hard... sorcs>barbs.

i remember i played vs. a blizzard sorc some time ago with my barb in tour... and he called a referee :-) finally i won that matchup 5-4.. i didnt use tele, i just used synch'n'run. and maybe mathskills (count down).

can you teach me how to duell?



He is a retard and ger.

This post was edited by Octogenarian on Oct 11 2009 05:13am

it was me, and you lamed me. and then you think you can kill a sorc fairly.

XD

it was indeed a fair duel, just lame. but when i read here "a sorc just lames the barb without tele" then it is not a different perspective.

and you can do that with current rules :-)



youre a sorc, not a barb, there is no complexity.

This post was edited by dyl4nd0u on Oct 11 2009 05:14am

with these rules blizz has not 99% chance to win, blizz has 100%



man we are working for helping barb users XD

This post was edited by Tornazzo on Oct 11 2009 05:14am

but vs. sorc its a melee-problem, you have to allow tele for stormers too. and maybe for libbies :-)

my argumentation is, dont get me wrong: "if a sorc can lame a barb without tele, she can do even more with tele - tele wont help the barb, it just increases the acceptance to nerf him more (no res, abs, using shield, or sorc with maxblock etc.) for long term"

This post was edited by dyl4nd0u on Oct 11 2009 05:19am

i think after a stormer that can recast ciclon armor is > all sorcs.

I think if libbies can tele may be theyr dools can have a normal dur (not 5h each dool) xD

that was lee's argumentation. barbs should play a bit like libbies vs. sorc without tele. predictive whirls, playing defensive to make the sorc come for them etc.

and and feel free to comment on my main argumentation :-P