Quote (ferdia @ Nov 17 2021 11:38pm)
See post #446, can I just ask you as well, have you been playing D2R and have you seen and experienced all the changes ?
I have been playing yes, have you?
I don't know what counter argument you want? It's literally you and maybe a handful more people that thinks this is a good idea.
90% of everyone is satisfied with all the existing builds, and that all classes has builds that can perform well in both 1v1 and tvt.
The majority of ppl thinks that it's better to actually get duelling and have a bit of fun before starting a rule book. Big general rules are fine to keep some ruleset, but things like lvling fury druids to 31 because it's not strong enough in 1v1 before any1 is even duelling is so dumb i have no words for it tbh. I don't need to argue for this, people can see this already.
This is just like in ogd2 when a handful of ppl thought it was a good idea to lvl some "fringe builds" to 59 and took that decision on their own even though the majority of ppl was against it. Worked out great iirc.
What arguments do you want?
I have always been of the mindset that we don't need to make every single build viable in 1v1, and i believe the majority of people agrees with me on this point. Fringe builds can actually be played even if they won't win a tour, believe it or not.
Yes, great. I'm sure the lld section is relieved
This post was edited by Skullflower on Nov 17 2021 04:44pm