i agree with you re: never attained, but i also agree that prime builds should have a decent chance to win. i would not say that it makes it more aggressive play, i would rephrase to say that players are rewarded for attacks if the replenish life life is lowered. in long duels you could successfuly hit someone 10 times and they will replenish all their life in that time. by reducing the cap, it means that your damage will count towards reducing your opponents life to zero.

i know of several lld players that are not tagged but are for a fact, scammers. Also I am aware of user that are tagged scammers where it has not been properly ascertained that they are scammers.

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 16 2010 07:56am

this is how black and white it is:

Soren I know your heart is in the right place.

if someone is making a full red/dr medidin for melee lld, will it be banned ?



name one

This post was edited by Imbaboun on Dec 16 2010 08:01am

to decide who is scammer and whos not is a whole other topic and has very little to do with this.

If the intent of the rule change is to reduce def play, is it not possible that that logic will just increase it? You REALLY REALLY dont want to get.

just so you get no wrong ideas: the intention of capping life repl is balance.

i think the discussion began with this. am i wrong?

i don't know how it began.
anyways my intention is balance. i don't want to cap pala's life repl to make him play more offensive, i want to make it fair for other chars to win vs pala.

just do what you should have done 2 weeks ago, you know im right

i agree with your first comment, not inclined to bring it up again as yes, its in effect a seperate issue (of sorts).

your comment is : reducing replenish life will potentially result in worse def play by users. this means that they are compensating due to having less replenish life.

I would say: it would make it easier to spot players that play too defencively, and certainly in tournaments, a referee could intervene, if required.