d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > 3rd Lld Tournament > Euscnl
Prev1373839404165Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 9,691
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Gold: 0.00
Dec 7 2010 03:46am
Quote (Perserker[PvP] @ Dec 7 2010 10:43am)
so the person with the most points duels the one with the least points etc?
i was also thinking about putting matchups together totally random.


i think random matchups will be best, least vs most is not even fair imo ^^

btw i have to leave this tour cuz not enough time with MLD/LLD togetter

This post was edited by Sliky on Dec 7 2010 03:51am
Member
Posts: 88,330
Joined: Jul 21 2005
Gold: 76,587.00
Dec 7 2010 03:54am
Quote (Sliky @ Dec 7 2010 09:46am)
i think random matchups will be best, least vs most is not even fair imo ^^

btw i have to leave this tour cuz not enough time with MLD/LLD togetter


nooooooooooo !

our duel :cry: ?

xD
Member
Posts: 41,227
Joined: Sep 12 2005
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 40%
Dec 7 2010 04:11am
Quote (Perserker[PvP] @ Dec 7 2010 10:43am)
so the person with the most points duels the one with the least points etc?
i was also thinking about putting matchups together totally random.


There should be an advantage of qualifying with most points as in more or less any sport and Tour!

1vs16
2vs15
3vs14

Etc etc

else i dont see the point of doing all these first duels :S

This post was edited by Steffer on Dec 7 2010 04:21am
Member
Posts: 45,039
Joined: Jan 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Member
Posts: 56,269
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Dec 7 2010 04:24am
i wouldnt put 1 vs 16 anymore.

i did that in my original tournaments and it gave 16th no chances. I did a compromise. look at some of the recent 49 tournments where there was a last 16 KO phase. (link to all previous tournaments in my profile or on 1st page of current 49 tournament).

The players should be rewarded for the qualifying (group) results but at the same time you dont want a mass murder, you want a certain degree of chance.

i cant view them but i think it was something like this:

1
9
5
13
3
11
7
15
2
10
6
14
4
12
8
16

- i.e. 1 vs 9, 5 vs 13 etc. note that the top players dont play off vs each other in the early rounds granting them the higher probablity of proceeding.

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 7 2010 04:27am
Member
Posts: 45,039
Joined: Jan 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Dec 7 2010 04:28am
Quote (ferdia @ 7 Dec 2010 12:24)
i wouldnt put 1 vs 16 anymore.

i did that in my original tournaments and it gave 16th no chances. I did a compromise. look at some of the recent 49 tournments where there was a last 16 KO phase. (link to all previous tournaments in my profile or on 1st page of current 49 tournament).

The players should be rewarded for the qualifying (group) results.

i cant view them but i think it was something like this:

1
9
5
13
3
11
7
15
2
10
6
14
4
12
8
16

- i.e. 1 vs 9, 5 vs 13 etc. note that the top players dont play off vs each other in the early rounds granting them the higher probablity of proceeding.


yea, i had something like that in mind. divide the rest of the players in half or in four. then first of each group duels last etc. makes it much fairer for the players with lower ranks.
Member
Posts: 56,269
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Dec 7 2010 04:49am
i remember one tournament when i posted the results that it was a massacre, all the higher ranked builds were the anti-char for each of their opponents. sometimes it just happens like that, and you can't do anything about it. you should always post the KO phase setup prior to the event as otherwise its biased and people will have a valid reason to complain.

thats why everyone in lreland hates the x-factor! it was supposed to be lowest ranked person KO'd but they wanted to keep Cher so they did a sing off and the "judges" voted and they kicked our Mary. = baised and not based on the peoples vote (score). i.e. they voided the scores attained by the users in the "group stage" after the 11th hour, because they didnt like the results. well, too bad!

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 7 2010 04:51am
Member
Posts: 45,039
Joined: Jan 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Dec 7 2010 06:01am
Group Phase:

KO Phase:


this will always be updated in my profile
Member
Posts: 45,039
Joined: Jan 6 2006
Gold: Locked
Warn: 20%
Dec 7 2010 06:02am
that's 16:2=8, we could also do 16:4=4. maybe i do that for the next tour.
Member
Posts: 15,819
Joined: Nov 9 2007
Gold: 6,932.37
Dec 7 2010 06:03am
i miss a lot of duels yet i know... i will try to do them this evening

This post was edited by minifoot on Dec 7 2010 06:04am
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev1373839404165Next
Add Reply New Topic