d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > Playing With People Who Have Scammed M8's > Europe
Prev1272829303139Next
Closed New Topic
Member
Posts: 365
Joined: Mar 22 2010
Gold: 0.00
Oct 11 2010 10:30am
Quote (Dwerfs @ Oct 11 2010 02:42pm)
you haven't countered with anything new but just saying the same shit over and over again.

I said that you expose your real personality when you ban people for not caring about if items are scammed or not aslong as it improves the community

it's a paradox - noone can buy them, scam them back is scamming = the one "who takes it for the team" is a scammer and get banned



a scam. but noone cared about the scam before the drama was caused.



oh, i forgot to reply.

imo we aren't, but that people get tired of the drama and played because of us to some part. when I left MLD went downhill - i only saw lombi/paul take initiative for duels.

now they're gone, so am I.

now it's dead


Quote (maximus_le_roi @ Oct 11 2010 02:06pm)
I wouldnt duel a scammer. But Royalton isnt.

so your options are 1) Royalton give back the stuff 2) or we won't duel with him :

1) if he does, he would scam his friend and it means you support scam
2) it means the stuff is lost for ever coz noone will ever be " allowed " to use it

Even tho, I can understand your logic. But I don't want the mld community to die, that's why I accepted ep guys and so on. But you know fer, you might use scammed stuff too ? who knows ?



c bolded part




Quote (maximus_le_roi @ Oct 11 2010 02:35pm)
But he didnt scam lee. Once again, I dislike the one who actually scammed Lee.
and he can't give back the stuff ( as I would ) since he would scam his ( scammer ) friend.
so once more it comes to 2 options :

1) he donesnt use the items, and they're lost for ever
2) he uses the items, play with them, make the community larger etc

but option 2) = lot of rage



Well, here is the point where you both show not to have a little piece of knowlegde about what is right and what not.
But i am a nice guy and help you.

There are some laws in this world and it seems to be that you both arent the most intelligent people arround here, so a simple example.
Person A got 100 Dollar. Person B steals this money and give it to Person C. Person C have to give it back when the police finds the connection and that he got the money. If he used the Money Person C will be forced to make an repayment.
Now it isnt hard to assign this example to this drama here. Carlos ( right ?!) got some good Items. There was a person who scammed him and give acces to Royalition. Royalition have to give it back.

This is how the laws would be in the real world, tell me where it is diffrent? Giving back the scammed Items is NOT scamming, because the scammer has never the legal ownership of those items.

Same thing is when you got to more money on your credit account because of a mistake of your bank. There you also owns money from someone else and you will have to repay it, if you spend it.

And maybe it is a game, but your argumentation is build up on something you would get kicked your ass for by every judge in the real world. So it is senseless to try it.

And yeah it would be better to let those items become lost instead of protecting such a bad attitude as you both and roya showed here. As you said, we speaking about pixels.

This post was edited by BlackHorus on Oct 11 2010 10:32am
Member
Posts: 10,157
Joined: Oct 19 2008
Gold: 2,022.00
Oct 11 2010 10:31am
NO ONE HERE LIKES PPL RELATED TO A SCAM IN ANY WAY. THAT PPL SHOULD GET BANNED/NK'D/BM'D OR W/E, BUT OBVIOUSLY THEY CAN'T BE A PART OF THE LLD/MLD COMUNITY. END OF THE STORY.

THIS IS IN THE TOP TIER OF THE STUPID AND SAD DISCUSSIONS. STOP IT PLS.

ps: soz for mayus, thought it would give more emphasis :D

Quote (BlackHorus @ Oct 11 2010 04:30pm)
Well, here is the point where you both show not to have a little piece of knowlegde about what is right and what not.
But i am a nice guy and help you.

There are some laws in this world and it seems to be that you both arent the most intelligent people arround here, so a simple example.
Person A got 100 Dollar. Person B steals this money and give it to Person C. Person C have to give it back when the police finds the connection and that he got the money. If he used the Money Person C will be forced to make an repayment.
Now it isnt hard to assign this example to this drama here. Carlos ( right ?!) got some good Items. There was a person who scammed him and give acces to Royalition. Royalition have to give it back.

This is how the laws would be in the real world, tell me whats where it is diffrent? Giving back the scammed Items is NOT scamming, because the scammer has never the legal ownership of those items.

Same thing is when you got to more money on your credit account because of a mistake of your bank. There you also owns money from someone else and you will have to repay it, if you spend it.

And maybe it is a game, but your argumentation is build up on something you would get kicked your ass for by every judge in the real world. So it is senseless to try it.

And yeah it would be better to let those items become lost instead of protecting such a bad attitude as you both and roya showed here. As you said, we speaking about pixels.


agree and I think most ppl will do but continuing this discussion is useless.

This post was edited by SirEdwards on Oct 11 2010 10:33am
Member
Posts: 9,691
Joined: Aug 10 2008
Gold: 0.00
Oct 11 2010 10:32am
Quote (Demonsangel @ Oct 11 2010 05:30pm)
How did this list not show what's the right option?

Also not reading 28 pages of spam, can any one tl;dr?


stfu belg
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Oct 11 2010 10:32am
see blackhoris's post - again, another user totally unknown to me with a logical responce.

This post was edited by ferdia on Oct 11 2010 10:33am
Member
Posts: 14,903
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Oct 11 2010 10:33am
lee isn't even active, it's his business with the guy whom gave me acces to his account, I don't even understand why you're making a pile of stories about that.
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Oct 11 2010 10:35am
the funny thing is that noone even bothered to read what i and paul has said...
Member
Posts: 56,264
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 575,205.03
Oct 11 2010 10:36am
lee isnt active... what? oh you mean on JSP? the last conversation I had with lee was when he told me that he no longer had his JSP account, which I mentioned previously.

Dej, I countered all of your arguments, also, several other users commented on your posts. which post are you referring to ?

This post was edited by ferdia on Oct 11 2010 10:40am
Member
Posts: 21,549
Joined: Apr 26 2008
Gold: 208.00
Oct 11 2010 10:36am
RAGE
Member
Posts: 3,969
Joined: Apr 21 2006
Gold: 16.93
Oct 11 2010 10:37am
Quote (Dwerfs @ Oct 11 2010 06:35pm)
the funny thing is that noone even bothered to read what i and paul has said...


That's a surprise

Quote (Sliky @ Oct 11 2010 06:32pm)
stfu belg

Sorry, ik antwoord alleen op beleeuug.
Member
Posts: 14,903
Joined: Sep 21 2008
Gold: 0.00
Warn: 10%
Oct 11 2010 10:37am
Quote (ferdia @ 11 Oct 2010 16:36)
lee isnt active... what? oh you mean on JSP? the last conversation I had with lee was when he told me that he no longer had his JSP account, which I mentioned previously.


For once you answer to a post, it just proves that when we got solid arguments you dodge the posts lol.
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev1272829303139Next
Closed New Topic