i really dont think chargers need more advantage.

I don't think replenish is the problem with my charger... Esp not without hard points in prayer/medi..


/e not being able to use a 1 skill/25 ds honor naga is though.

This post was edited by moonhammer on Dec 16 2010 05:49am

another solution (which i would accept if i played charger) would be honor without peasant. imo a 1 pala / 2 pc circ with nice stats is easy to find and can beat peasant.

with 12 life repl on palas i would neither ban honor nor peasant, just both together. and imo a charger can do fine without pesant. joost?

I find all this difficult ruling with chargers pretty awkward to be honest. By my knowledge I was the only charger on euscnl playing in tours/tvts and for one char we keep going in to such depts of discussion while replenish without hardpoints in medi/prayer will be the LEAST of your concerns with my offensive playstyle and massive dmg...

Strongly considering just dumping the char instead of constantly remodelling it for the sake of someone else's peace of mind.

there are plenty of chargers and libbies now

rules arent made for single characters. at least they shouldnt be. not sure why you seem to see it like that. Even if there were no chargers we'd still have to have rules that take them into account.

I'm not talking about libb's, that's a totally different char.

Let there be 10 chargers (exaggerating for argument's sake). Does the 10 repl (10/256*25=±1 life per second) make the difference with a char that needs to get in your face to hit?

I've never seen this problem, and I've never faced the problem while duelling other chargers.




Well, we're talking char specific here, atleast pala specific. There where a hdin charges off leaving hammers everywhere, I have to be on you in order to do dmg. There is no use for me to stay xxx screens away since a charger can't do shit there. I'm getting the repl issue, just not the part about nerving a charger as hard as a libb/hdin.

This post was edited by moonhammer on Dec 16 2010 06:06am

there were really that issues about rep life in the tour? To mee that 15-22 rep life rule from before seemed nice tbh.

ps: Will have to get worse gloves and amu for my psn zon ssicne using 12 rep lfie peasant on both items have more than 3 rep life each :/

ps2: No rep life limit in tvt btw no? If some1 is left and defwhores cuz imba rep, his team loses. ez

not sure what you are referring to here.
1. i stated that rep life is a bigger advantage @ lld then it is @ mld or HLD
2. i echoed suggests by other users to reduce the replenish life @30
3. reducing replenish life means that the duels won't stalemate and it will become more evident as to who is deffing and who is not.
4. im not sure what you mean by your closing statement since i already highlighted the difference in % damage dealt per attack. However if your comment is in relation to joost's post, i would agree with him.

reading your post im getting the impression that you see no issues with the current replenish life. why don't you just say that without disecting my post for perceived slights or attacks on the bible of 30.

users have expressed concerns on replenish life, i simply agreed with them, if you have an issue, take it up with them in this topic.

my last post in this thread.

This post was edited by ferdia on Dec 16 2010 06:08am