that's huge stats increase :/
and you sacrifie it just to hammer/charge/foh in one slot ?
hm that doesnt sound logic to me

it massively assists playstyle
it'd be like having teleport and fireball on different switches

false
Basically you must focus on hammering anw, the only times you rly do want to charge is vs bowys and assas imo.

my playstyle is incredibly aggressive. You'll get 1 charge for just about every two hammers. each duel my opponent gets charge attempts about once every 1-2 seconds.

i built my libbys with scepter and have spirit in stash for duels when charge dmg isnt necessary. switching weapons works well vs some, but scepter built > switch build, in most situations. even 75fcr scepter built(125fcr from stash with spirit) > 125fcr switch built. i have made like 5 libbys at least with different setups when it comes to swtich built, scepter build and scepter with 75fcr and scepter with 125fcr

This post was edited by Antichrist- on May 10 2011 06:31am

ah y it's a matter of play style then, I can understand why you need 1 slot then. that doesnt mean its better tho.
for example vs nec, if you play like this, you won't stand a chance :/



I'd tend to trust your words, but I also built libbys myself and frequented libbys players and everyone concluded that 2 slots works better, cause as I mentionned a libby is more a hammer with charge option.

no, that is a hammerdin with a charge switch

a REAL libby is hammer and charge on same switch

Your logic is more based upon mld. On mld charge dmg/hammer on 1 switch would be obviously very bad, since the charge dmg would most likely suck balls. On lvl 30 on the other hand it's possible to get them both acceptable, and never having to switch. I'd heavily prefer the latter.

I dont like libbys in general, i find them inferior to hdins, but any libby that has to switch to charge is a FAIL build.

This post was edited by Ass_Hat on May 10 2011 10:28am

I disagree :/



that's true



well... no