d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > 10th Lvl 49 Mld Tournament > Euro Non-ladder
Prev1150151152153154189Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Aug 14 2010 07:23am
Quote (harabec @ Aug 14 2010 01:46pm)
i call it common sense, those who don't understand it might come up with funny names for it :D
had an interesting pm-conversation with him, perhaps ask him if i'm "oldschool" or not^^


i forgot that you nicked grunge ~.~, but y. being oldschool doesn't necessary mean you have the right to change something you've been long time gone from. and joost says u was bad at barb back then

This post was edited by Dwerfs on Aug 14 2010 07:23am
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 14 2010 07:36am
Quote (Dwerfs @ 14 Aug 2010 14:23)
i forgot that you nicked grunge ~.~, but y. being oldschool doesn't necessary mean you have the right to change something you've been long time gone from. and joost says u was bad at barb back then


actually i'm trying to change stuff back that were fine then and broken now, such as libby - it's not some wild idea, i can say from experience that it was just more balanced with the rules at that time
and who is that "joost"?
iirc i did pretty well on barb and won some tours, including tvt :)

btw i am roughly talking about these rules: http://www.lw-pvp.de/lvl491on1/lvl49rules.php?id=2#eng
might be interesting for you people to see how mld was played when it was in its prime


This post was edited by harabec on Aug 14 2010 07:42am
Member
Posts: 56,271
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Aug 14 2010 07:41am
re: FoH

1. I already restricted the V/T - Max FoH OR Max Holy Shock, 1 point synergies.
2. I already said that I am baning conviction for the next tournament - The purpose here is to try to SLOWLY bring in a working V/T.
3. I already said that a pure FoH is banned.
4. as chris said: "conv is useless or lames out new players." << thats why its being banned.
5. Yes, I'm aware its not fair when you consider Cold Sorc's Cold Mastery - THis is something I will have to go away and think about.

Joost is Moonhammer.

This post was edited by ferdia on Aug 14 2010 07:44am
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 14 2010 07:46am
Quote (ferdia @ 14 Aug 2010 14:41)
re: FoH

1. I already restricted the V/T - Max FoH OR Max Holy Shock, 1 point synergies.
2. I already said that I am baning conviction for the next tournament - The purpose here is to try to SLOWLY bring in a working V/T.
3. I already said that a pure FoH is banned.
4. as chris said: "conv is useless or lames out new players." << thats why its being banned.
5. Yes, I'm aware its not fair when you consider Cold Sorc's Cold Mastery - THis is something I will have to go away and think about.


that's bullshit and you're giving the explanation yourself with point 5
getting resistance is part of pvp and nowadays anyone can afford those scs

cold sorcs need cold mastery and foh needs conviction, that's just the way it is.

This post was edited by harabec on Aug 14 2010 07:58am
Member
Posts: 56,271
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Aug 14 2010 08:07am
this is a tournament topic, please post discussions such as this in another topic. lets keep all the "bullshit" out.

thanks.

ferdi

This post was edited by ferdia on Aug 14 2010 08:13am
Banned
Posts: 16,513
Joined: Sep 1 2008
Gold: 133.70
Warn: 90%
Aug 14 2010 08:13am
Quote (harabec @ 14 Aug 2010 14:36)
actually i'm trying to change stuff back that were fine then and broken now, such as libby - it's not some wild idea, i can say from experience that it was just more balanced with the rules at that time
and who is that "joost"?
iirc i did pretty well on barb and won some tours, including tvt :)

btw i am roughly talking about these rules: http://www.lw-pvp.de/lvl491on1/lvl49rules.php?id=2#eng
might be interesting for you people to see how mld was played when it was in its prime


A Sorceress isn't allowed to play with more than 45% Blockchance, Vs. all Chars (in the Stats-Window you must see max. 45% Block)!

ROFL
Member
Posts: 56,271
Joined: Jan 19 2007
Gold: 574,605.03
Aug 14 2010 08:14am
If you are going to post in this topic, I only want to see results, I dont want to see discussions on rules.

This post was edited by ferdia on Aug 14 2010 08:16am
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 14 2010 08:32am
Quote (baboun @ 14 Aug 2010 15:13)
A Sorceress isn't allowed to play with more than 45% Blockchance, Vs. all Chars (in the Stats-Window you must see max. 45% Block)!

ROFL


opponents had less res :)
imo that leads to more action-packed duels.. and sorcs needed to be very good.. low block is a nice way to separate the pros from the noobs :p

ok last post that doesn't include a result! (montaress where are you?)

another fun fact since dwerfs is so keen on bashing europvp:
between 2005 and 2006 there were lvl49 tournaments hosted there, because lw-pvp was mostly german and we tried to implent non-germans, by marvel and myself: http://web.archive.org/web/20060217160645/ep-pvp.net/forums/
have been trying to find the rules we used but it seems i can't.. if anyone is good with stuff like that, i'd give 5fg for anyone who's able to find the mld ruleset we used then!

Quote (MrHandsome @ 14 Aug 2010 15:57)
oh man^^


^^

This post was edited by harabec on Aug 14 2010 09:01am
Member
Posts: 24,511
Joined: May 3 2008
Gold: 128.70
Aug 14 2010 08:57am
oh man^^
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Aug 14 2010 09:06am
I'll be straight, even if harabec is a huso with small dick he do have some valid points (p.S SO FAR ONLY COLD/CONV...), but nevertheless some ideas are... >:(

This post was edited by Dwerfs on Aug 14 2010 09:06am
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev1150151152153154189Next
Add Reply New Topic