d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > 10th Lvl 49 Mld Tournament > Euro Non-ladder
Prev1149150151152153189Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Aug 13 2010 06:17pm
Quote (dyl4nd0u @ Aug 14 2010 01:16am)
thats it. perfectly right. with an opponent with stack its a pure waste.

so you have a v/t?


I'm the one who built the "first" v/t on europe like 2 years ago lol

This post was edited by Dwerfs on Aug 13 2010 06:17pm
Member
Posts: 2,769
Joined: Apr 19 2007
Gold: 0.00
Aug 13 2010 06:22pm
i do remember like 2 good v/t players (drewy and lee imo), but lee had a 95% smite part imo...

and i remember some really really good smiths. when you play smith well, youre a good v/t aswell. :)

i think our whole discussion about foh and v/t and conv was ineffective, or: wrong!

see, you just had to propergate that right, lets say:

"
1. pure, defensive fohs are lame and bad.
2. conv is useless or lames out new players.
3. v/ts are one of the best classes along with esfb, bowa and libby. (and they do not need conv!)
"

@ all haters, argument vs. that. thats right unless you are seasa with 100k fg, habarec with his gozu oldschool opinion-skills or no experience like derpate. :)

ah, and dej, im just wndering why noone ever rolled a smith btw... theyre really good....

This post was edited by dyl4nd0u on Aug 13 2010 06:24pm
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Aug 13 2010 06:25pm
Quote (dyl4nd0u @ Aug 14 2010 01:22am)
i do remember like 2 good v/t players (drewy and lee imo), but lee had a 95% smite part imo...

and i remember some really really good smiths. when you play smith well, youre a good v/t aswell. :)

i think our whole discussion about foh and v/t and conv was ineffective, or: wrong!

see, you just had to propergate that right, lets say:

"
1. pure, defensive fohs are lame and bad.
2. conv is useless or lames out new players.
3. v/ts are one of the best classes along with esfb, bowa and libby. (and they do not need conv!)
"

@ all haters, argument vs. that. thats right unless you are seasa with 100k fg. :)

ah, and dej, im just wndering why noone ever rolled a smith btw... theyre really good....


because every1 is playing snipe chars or some shit because they can't play melee.

Jim is the best v/t ever on europe, period. point is that - pure fohs are shit because they lack everything except dmg
if conv is laming out new players then ban CM
and the ep faggots making up rules that'd work "and be fair" (even if noone else think so) on a private raelm are #1 theorycrafting
Member
Posts: 38,984
Joined: Mar 30 2006
Gold: 955.17
Warn: 10%
Aug 13 2010 08:58pm
ehm, just to let you know. Lee will win this tour. even he is a scamming retard.
but you should make some new rules for es fb. because every single tour.. a fb won.

sieg
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 14 2010 06:35am
Quote (dyl4nd0u @ 14 Aug 2010 01:22)
i do remember like 2 good v/t players (drewy and lee imo), but lee had a 95% smite part imo...

and i remember some really really good smiths. when you play smith well, youre a good v/t aswell. :)

i think our whole discussion about foh and v/t and conv was ineffective, or: wrong!

see, you just had to propergate that right, lets say:

"
1. pure, defensive fohs are lame and bad.
2. conv is useless or lames out new players.
3. v/ts are one of the best classes along with esfb, bowa and libby. (and they do not need conv!)
"

@ all haters, argument vs. that. thats right unless you are seasa with 100k fg, habarec with his gozu oldschool opinion-skills or no experience like derpate. :)

ah, and dej, im just wndering why noone ever rolled a smith btw... theyre really good....


you're a clown^^
i played mld before any of you guys did, in a time where joke chars such as libby did not exist because most ppl then had a brain and realized that hammerdin with charge + vigor + medi + chargedmg is not balanced due to it's abuse of gamebugs
now you illiterates actually suggest a "foh" that cannot use conv, wow i thought it can't get more stupid than that
then you also suggest that a pala can use both hammer and foh while being able to passive charge vs chars like barb and you expect it to be a match?
go play tetris, d2 is definitely the wrong game for morons like yourself or dwerfs

Quote (Octogenarian @ 14 Aug 2010 03:58)
ehm, just to let you know. Lee will win this tour. even he is a scamming retard.
but you should make some new rules for es fb. because every single tour.. a fb won.

sieg


jo imba fb :D
Member
Posts: 78,286
Joined: Jun 22 2005
Gold: 30.10
Aug 14 2010 06:41am
Quote (harabec @ Aug 14 2010 01:35pm)
you're a clown^^
i played mld before any of you guys did, in a time where joke chars such as libby did not exist because most ppl then had a brain and realized that hammerdin with charge + vigor + medi + chargedmg is not balanced due to it's abuse of gamebugs
now you illiterates actually suggest a "foh" that cannot use conv, wow i thought it can't get more stupid than that
then you also suggest that a pala can use both hammer and foh while being able to passive charge vs chars like barb and you expect it to be a match?
go play tetris, d2 is definitely the wrong game for morons like yourself or dwerfs



jo imba fb :D


you raelly think your EP theorycrafting works here. post a build with a mage that can passively charge like that. and lol at you believing you're so oldschool^^; Jim played LLD before you even spawned on bnet
Member
Posts: 40,810
Joined: Aug 22 2005
Gold: 5,817.01
Aug 14 2010 06:46am
Quote (Dwerfs @ 14 Aug 2010 13:41)
you raelly think your EP theorycrafting works here. post a build with a mage that can passively charge like that. and lol at you believing you're so oldschool^^; Jim played LLD before you even spawned on bnet


i call it common sense, those who don't understand it might come up with funny names for it :D
had an interesting pm-conversation with him, perhaps ask him if i'm "oldschool" or not^^
Member
Posts: 8,070
Joined: Mar 29 2006
Gold: 304.26
Aug 14 2010 06:55am
Quote (harabec @ Aug 14 2010 01:46pm)
i call it common sense, those who don't understand it might come up with funny names for it :D
had an interesting pm-conversation with him, perhaps ask him if i'm "oldschool" or not^^


Stop this endless and boring discussion about passive charge. Jim 5-0ed every passive charge pala on fb/blizz.
If u can't do it either its ur own fault due to ur lack of skill on facing them.

Back to topic, gl everyone ^^
Member
Posts: 38,984
Joined: Mar 30 2006
Gold: 955.17
Warn: 10%
Aug 14 2010 07:14am
Quote (LicioGlax @ Aug 14 2010 12:55pm)
Stop this endless and boring discussion about passive charge. Jim 5-0ed every passive charge pala on fb/blizz.
If u can't do it either its ur own fault due to ur lack of skill on facing them.

Back to topic, gl everyone ^^


thats bla bla
Member
Posts: 9,922
Joined: Oct 20 2007
Gold: 17,502.03
Aug 14 2010 07:15am
Quote (LicioGlax @ 14 Aug 2010 14:55)
Stop this endless and boring discussion about passive charge. Jim 5-0ed every passive charge pala on fb/blizz.
If u can't do it either its ur own fault due to ur lack of skill on facing them.

Back to topic, gl everyone ^^


thats goed

Quote (Octogenarian @ 14 Aug 2010 15:14)
thats bla bla


ruhe
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev1149150151152153189Next
Add Reply New Topic