Quote (dyl4nd0u @ 14 Aug 2010 01:22)
i do remember like 2 good v/t players (drewy and lee imo), but lee had a 95% smite part imo...
and i remember some really really good smiths. when you play smith well, youre a good v/t aswell.

i think our whole discussion about foh and v/t and conv was ineffective, or: wrong!
see, you just had to propergate that right, lets say:
"
1. pure, defensive fohs are lame and bad.
2. conv is useless or lames out new players.
3. v/ts are one of the best classes along with esfb, bowa and libby. (and they do not need conv!)
"
@ all haters, argument vs. that. thats right unless you are seasa with 100k fg, habarec with his gozu oldschool opinion-skills or no experience like derpate.

ah, and dej, im just wndering why noone ever rolled a smith btw... theyre really good....
you're a clown^^
i played mld before any of you guys did, in a time where joke chars such as libby did not exist because most ppl then had a brain and realized that hammerdin with charge + vigor + medi + chargedmg is not balanced due to it's abuse of gamebugs
now you illiterates actually suggest a "foh" that cannot use conv, wow i thought it can't get more stupid than that
then you also suggest that a pala can use both hammer and foh while being able to passive charge vs chars like barb and you expect it to be a match?
go play tetris, d2 is definitely the wrong game for morons like yourself or dwerfs
Quote (Octogenarian @ 14 Aug 2010 03:58)
ehm, just to let you know. Lee will win this tour. even he is a scamming retard.
but you should make some new rules for es fb. because every single tour.. a fb won.
sieg
jo imba fb
