coz of imba zon


we need a refeee who can judge when a libby plays def (including me) or v/t is pays def or any kind of sorc

lmfao

i would gladly ref it, but from what i saw today, i think some ppl would get quite upset with how i regard things. and i would obv excuse myself from any duel ferdia participates in, because its rather obvious we dont like each other.

/e: i'd want to have either a sorc (empty, or rando shit gear) that i could teleport for a long time with, or a din (same, shit or no gear) with high skilled vigor so i could keep up.

This post was edited by bigspot_05 on Jun 10 2011 07:08pm

girls girls girls...
isn´t this a bit ridiculous?
isnt this supposed to be a GAME?
you know, like having FUN? fun with friends and even foes?
of course i´m happy if i win. but loosing 1:5 in some really nice, close and challenging duels (like vs ferdia in the 1:1 tour) is much more fun than an easy 5:0 win tbh.
and if a win based on lame, bm, deffing,... gameplay is fun for anybody out there - well, life will teach you, poor boy.
maybe all of you should stop taking this so serious and start having fun again?
what does the winner of the tour get? a house? a sportscar? a million dollars?
just ridiculous...

OMG THIS IS MLD BITCH, ITS SRS BUISNESS!!!!!

True story

just ban passiv charge plz, that sux really hard.

This post was edited by TCAvenger on Jun 11 2011 08:01am

lol... this was one of the most ridicilous statements so far^^

you can't stack up FRW on a mld paladin like you did in EP

paladins dont have enough skills to push vigor unless hammerdin, conc isnt strong enough to keep people off

passive charge is what makes paladins viable. the usage of it is extremely abused though

go away you fool, to play with scammers is no fun
is ok, you ladder? you leevolka friend? is ok

that´s one kind of poor boy i meant^^
sry, couldn´t resist...

concerning the duel of felios vs ira: after the duel i checked the paladin's resistance and it was revealed that he used 58% too much. since this amount cripples the blizzard's dmg to an extent that is game-deciding i have told ferdia/tw3ety to replay the duel starting from 4-0 in favor of dej/f10eq (end result was 4-5). however ferdia decided to give team felinos the 5-0 win.

concerning the tw3ety's game play, and libby in general: apart from sorc, libby is the fastest moving build. therefor i expect libby to play the offensive role against anything but sorc. the mentioned "jodering" is not what i like to see either but it's the only way to effectively duel sorceress on this class and that is the reason why i tolerated it. furthermore i limited the dueling area to reduce the paladin's moving space.

concerning referee: i would prefer to keep this to a minimum and for people to get along / find consensus on their own. also asking for a referee before having even started the duel creates an atmosphere of distrust which is not really productive. however in case there is no other way to handle the situation, contact either me, ferdia or a person all duelists agree on.

i now consider this issue finished and hope we can move on.

if you feel like discussing this further do so either by pm or in another topic - this is not the place for it

next chart update follows tomorrow.

there's a difference between playing defensive and litterally jodering around the map just throwing out random hammers? on top of it playing with 58% cr too much is fucked up. even if they "accidently had a new setup involving suicide" they still planned to use atleast 8% too much stack

fucked up