d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Diablo II > Diablo 2 Discussion > Low Level Dueling > ~ So Which Lvl Should They Be? ~ > Sorceress In The Lvl18 Dueling Bracket
Prev191011121317Next
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 30,822
Joined: Dec 29 2007
Gold: 5,402.07
May 20 2010 05:26pm
Quote (elusive @ May 21 2010 12:20pm)
anya is a terrible way to balance things out - there is no way to know if your opponent does this (other than than the constant s/eing Shinra causes in tvts ^___^)

resists are also stupid - it is fair game to have 75% resist

i said that leveling to 21 is optimal to make sorcs competitive, but i do not support this so i apologize if i seemed to support this

18 is 18, thats how it should be now. this is not 1.09 where there is a small sect of LLDers that commonly agree on a balanced level set, LLD has grown too much for this. as much as id like to see 21 sorcs/20 csers/21 maulers ect, i dont think it'll work.


I think 18 was never *really* designed to be a balanced bracket, I don't think 30 was either but it just turned out that it was.
However the discrepencies between various builds at 18 are so large that not compensating for them seems unfair on the underdog builds.
This said, it doesn't mean level your chars till they pwn all.

Dammit I'm in essay writing mode so I sound like a computer.
Member
Posts: 16,957
Joined: Nov 10 2008
Gold: 15.00
May 20 2010 05:30pm
Quote (elusive @ 20 May 2010 19:20)
anya is a terrible way to balance things out - there is no way to know if your opponent does this (other than than the constant s/eing Shinra causes in tvts ^___^)

resists are also stupid - it is fair game to have 75% resist

i said that leveling to 21 is optimal to make sorcs competitive, but i do not support this so i apologize if i seemed to support this

18 is 18, thats how it should be now. this is not 1.09 where there is a small sect of LLDers that commonly agree on a balanced level set, LLD has grown too much for this. as much as id like to see 21 sorcs/20 csers/21 maulers ect, i dont think it'll work.


Roy and I just had a conversation about this the other day. This can be argued, but I feel as if fire res is the most easily obtainable res to get on a 18 next to psn as far as casters go. Me personally I try to avoid ayna's on all my duelers and stack without it to just eliminate the possibility of even having it kick it. dex/30 res jewels and base on gear makes it very simple to get 75 fire. Which on east if normally what you see the most of be it from a fissure, sin or in my case fber.
Member
Posts: 2,205
Joined: Dec 30 2006
Gold: 6.97
May 20 2010 05:30pm
Might aswell forget all of the usual lvls and go for the level you want. 9-30lvls being lld 31-49 being mld
due wuthl thouse who agree to duel with you. its for the fun anyways. though, that way there would be no tournaments as ppls levels varie too much.
Member
Posts: 10,157
Joined: Oct 19 2008
Gold: 2,022.00
May 20 2010 05:33pm
Quote (elusive @ May 20 2010 11:20pm)
anya is a terrible way to balance things out - there is no way to know if your opponent does this (other than than the constant s/eing Shinra causes in tvts ^___^)

resists are also stupid - it is fair game to have 75% resist

i said that leveling to 21 is optimal to make sorcs competitive, but i do not support this so i apologize if i seemed to support this

18 is 18, thats how it should be now.  this is not 1.09 where there is a small sect of LLDers that commonly agree on a balanced level set, LLD has grown too much for this.  as much as id like to see 21 sorcs/20 csers/21 maulers ect, i dont think it'll work.


We can always give it a try if this lld community agrees. It will b more than enough since the tvts/tours/ladders are almost 100% from ppl that use to check this forum. We just n to be open minded and give it a try. Who wouldnt like to see more variety of chars at "18"? I personally love uncommon builds (almost all my 18s are silly chars like shiver armor sorc with static/fw and a bow/throw pala like pud).
Btw if we test and balance it properly, non jsp lld'rs might be sent here to check that new lld improvement.
Member
Posts: 27,768
Joined: Sep 6 2004
Gold: 234.06
May 20 2010 05:44pm
Quote (required @ May 20 2010 07:26pm)
I think 18 was never *really* designed to be a balanced bracket, I don't think 30 was either but it just turned out that it was.
However the discrepencies between various builds at 18 are so large that not compensating for them seems unfair on the underdog builds.
This said, it doesn't mean level your chars till they pwn all.

Dammit I'm in essay writing mode so I sound like a computer.


in no way will the 18 bracket be balanced - physical characters reign supreme, but semi-obscure builds like fb/fissure/trapper/psy hammerlol are very solid in tvts

Quote (ShamansEulogy @ May 20 2010 07:30pm)
Roy and I just had a conversation about this the other day. This can be argued, but I feel as if fire res is the most easily obtainable res to get on a 18 next to psn as far as casters go. Me personally I try to avoid ayna's on all my duelers and stack without it to just eliminate the possibility of even having it kick it.  dex/30 res jewels and base on gear makes it very simple to get 75 fire. Which on east if normally what you see the most of be it from a  fissure, sin or in my case fber.


yeah, lightning-based chars are extremely limited (basically cs/lb zons), so its all fire chars which is like you said, easy to stack. personally, if you have 75% fire resist its fair game, but constant s/eing in a 1v1 is kind of lame for anyas. tvt i can def understand because i know how game changing a char like Shinra can be, as your opponents cannot stick together and it forces more 1v1 situations which given a proper team makeup can cause lopsided duel results

Quote (SirEdwards @ May 20 2010 07:33pm)
We can always give it a try if this lld community agrees. It will b more than enough since the tvts/tours/ladders are almost 100% from ppl that use to check this forum. We just n to be open minded and give it a try. Who wouldnt like to see more variety of chars at "18"? I personally love uncommon builds (almost all my 18s are silly chars like shiver armor sorc with static/fw and a bow/throw pala like pud).
Btw if we test and balance it properly, non jsp lld'rs might be sent here to check that new lld improvement.


i too love uncommon builds - although i'm primarily known for Vanquish, ive always tried to make obscure or uncommon builds, and now that i sold off a lot of my HLD rotting gear i have the funds to do so.

still, to alter the level to make "certain" builds viable will virtually require a 100% vote from the community. if this occurs - im all for it, because id be one of the first to make a few of the underpowered builds more viable, especially in a tvt setting
Member
Posts: 18,730
Joined: Jun 1 2009
Gold: 0.00
May 20 2010 05:51pm
Quote (elusive @ May 20 2010 06:20pm)
anya is a terrible way to balance things out - there is no way to know if your opponent does this (other than than the constant s/eing Shinra causes in tvts ^___^)

resists are also stupid - it is fair game to have 75% resist

i said that leveling to 21 is optimal to make sorcs competitive, but i do not support this so i apologize if i seemed to support this

18 is 18, thats how it should be now. this is not 1.09 where there is a small sect of LLDers that commonly agree on a balanced level set, LLD has grown too much for this. as much as id like to see 21 sorcs/20 csers/21 maulers ect, i dont think it'll work.


I understand your concerns. Why dont you test different levels with us in open. All im asking is that people have an open mind because as i have said before, people had an open mind to change the status quoe to strictly 18 once before. Change can sometimes be good but i wouldnt propose any harsh changes until they are rigorously tested in a controlled setting with lots of valid input from others
Member
Posts: 30,822
Joined: Dec 29 2007
Gold: 5,402.07
May 20 2010 05:55pm
Quote (elusive @ May 21 2010 12:44pm)
in no way will the 18 bracket be balanced - physical characters reign supreme, but semi-obscure builds like fb/fissure/trapper/psy hammerlol are very solid in tvts



yeah, lightning-based chars are extremely limited (basically cs/lb zons), so its all fire chars which is like you said, easy to stack. personally, if you have 75% fire resist its fair game, but constant s/eing in a 1v1 is kind of lame for anyas. tvt i can def understand because i know how game changing a char like Shinra can be, as your opponents cannot stick together and it forces more 1v1 situations which given a proper team makeup can cause lopsided duel results



i too love uncommon builds - although i'm primarily known for Vanquish, ive always tried to make obscure or uncommon builds, and now that i sold off a lot of my HLD rotting gear i have the funds to do so.

still, to alter the level to make "certain" builds viable will virtually require a 100% vote from the community. if this occurs - im all for it, because id be one of the first to make a few of the underpowered builds more viable, especially in a tvt setting


in reply to this; this is true, but theres a difference between said "solidarity" in TvTs and being a good character.
The people who invest all the fg and time into these characters deserve more than to just be a place filler in a physical damage based battle.
Member
Posts: 27,768
Joined: Sep 6 2004
Gold: 234.06
May 20 2010 06:04pm
Quote (required @ May 20 2010 07:55pm)
in reply to this; this is true, but theres a difference between said "solidarity" in TvTs and being a good character.
The people who invest all the fg and time into these characters deserve more than to just be a place filler in a physical damage based battle.


well thats what i alluded to later; i spent a fuckload on my fissure and he is very critical in a tvt setting - as are other chars. even cheaper chars like bf/kick/trap hybrids can wreck havoc in tvt settings

Quote (lld_mayhem @ May 20 2010 07:51pm)
I understand your concerns. Why dont you test different levels with us in open. All im asking is that people have an open mind because as i have said before, people had an open mind to change the status quoe to strictly 18 once before. Change can sometimes be good but i wouldnt propose any harsh changes until they are rigorously tested in a controlled setting with lots of valid input from others


i mean, i can already name things off the top of my head that would be subject to level increases:

-all sorcs
-cs/lb zon
-mauler


list can easily go on
Member
Posts: 16,957
Joined: Nov 10 2008
Gold: 15.00
May 20 2010 06:05pm
Quote (required @ 20 May 2010 19:55)
in reply to this; this is true, but theres a difference between said "solidarity" in TvTs and being a good character.
The people who invest all the fg and time into these characters deserve more than to just be a place filler in a physical damage based battle.


lvl 19 would make my fber gozu chant buffer for tvt. wack wack bang pow!
Member
Posts: 10,157
Joined: Oct 19 2008
Gold: 2,022.00
May 20 2010 06:07pm
Yeah I am with u. I just think that 18 needs a mini "extension" for certain builds like vlld had. Idk but I guess that when they were first established the vlld-lld brackets it only were 9 18 and 30. Then vlld players found out there were few other builds with nice stuff that failed hard against the other ones (aka casters). In that moment they made the 9-12 extension for vlld and it just improved that bracket. We need a new patch for that "18" imo. I would b really happy if everyone could agree.

The point isn't to make weaker builds strong enough to pwn the others, it will be just to make them strong enough to be taken seriously. They will still lose to cookie cutters but at least will b fun to use and worth a try. I almost deleted my cs/bow zon a few times. Was really frustrating rmking her and thinking in every possible way to make it stronger enough to duel others, but failing. Apart from pubs she couldnt kill almost anything apart another 18 cs zon I met lol. Was like a joke seeing necs not even moving to kill me or zealers not even losing 1/4 of life or not going to heal to duel me again. Today I lvl'd her to 20 and for the first time I enjoyed dueling minifoots chars. I still got pk'd but at least he had to run with the nec and was bit forced to use some resi on the pala (aka he took the cs as a real char) He also had fun dueling her for the first time, coz we all know that ez duels are kinda boring.

The cs example can be applied to shappers and maybe sorcs (dunno about them tho since never made one but to me sorc > cs or shaper since it's ranged, but still have the very low dmg issue). If this could be agreed Im 100% sure lld will gain more popularity at least in that community coz tell me, who wouldn't like to try a shaper or something knowing fg wont be wasted?

ps: rofl what a wall of text :(

e/corrected few grammar mistakes xD

This post was edited by SirEdwards on May 20 2010 06:09pm
Go Back To Low Level Dueling Topic List
Prev191011121317Next
Add Reply New Topic