@paul: not even mine. but feel free to ask your friend to try to scam it.

@jan: there should be a "no laming" rule replacing all those 100 useless rules.

for example pots:

a poor/new player might need manapots to have a proper gameplay. if a rich player specializes a build completely for manapots its an abuse and should be penalized.

mld was based on agreement and understanding. this tour/rules made it far to bureaucratic.

actually 77 sec is pretty fast

Or you're dueling a hammerdin that wants you to run into his obvs hammerfields and refuses to do anything offensive.

bullshit

stopwatch disagrees

i think in the last time the lrp on an es sorc was capped at 15, any other char was allowd to use 20 lrp, which seems pretty fair for me

the light sorc in the tour has 25... maybe thats too much

Thats true but it doesnt work out that way when people play competitavly. Also those tour rules act like a guidline for most people in public games.
I appreciate the less amount of rules at lld compared to mld but liferep is a very important factor comparable to resistance and my suggestion was just to adjust the maximum liefrep for sorc/pala, ranged and melee individually as well as decrease the overall amount (there is allready a cap at 22 liferep for all chars at perz' rules)
Btw dont compare the role of liferep at mld to it in lld, the average dmg taken at lld is much lower compared to mld making liferep much more effective.

e: My question is why cap at 15 or 20? How does that improve the gamplay? Why not cap at 5 or even 0? Also the graduation of maximum lieferep i suggested was not in order to give other chars an unfair advantage.
I just think that a barb/druid will profit much less from 20 liefrep than a sorc and therefore their gear-variety will increase a bit (i doubt anyone would use perf skulls on a melee char xD).

This post was edited by BeAy on Dec 5 2010 06:26am

read minifoot's post. and read fer's arguement regarding ctc.

-> capping repl on that low level will ban several useful items aswell.

and we'd talk about the real effect of repl for a duel that lasts after an average time of <<5 or 10 min. if there is no effekt, as you say, why ban it then?

€: just lmk the matter atm. did you experience some abuse earlier? if not, why change rules without intention?

This post was edited by dyl4nd0u on Dec 5 2010 07:07am

I did