2010 armada vs 2010 tahoe.

pros cons?

i like the features and looks of inside of the tahoe and the armada. but i think the tahoe is just bland on the exterior.

dependability?

Would rather have the Tahoe over the Armada, but I might be a little biased.

5.3's are pretty fucking stout and dependable.

Bingo
Tahoe all day

Also say Tahoe


It might be boring looking, but they are reliable.



Not to say the Nissan isn't. But comparably, the Tahoe is the better choice in my opinion.

tahoe foh sho

you dont think the armadas 5.6l engine is better than a old 5.3 l gm?

this is my problem i cant find a hoe 2007-2010 under 90k miles for under 17k

i found a 2010 armada le loaded. navigation elec leveling system. etc the works power lift gate. huge cargo area compared to the hoes cargo area. 90k miles for 14 grand. also.. ive noticed that better cars and trucks are harder to find seeing that people are satisfied with them and not trading thewm in.

i can find a huge selection of tahoes.
but the selection is very thin for armadas.

the only thing i like about the tahoe is the engine seems strrong still at 130k miles as i test drove a 2008 ltz last year with 135k on it.
i also drove 06 aramda last year with 132k on it and noticed barely a different in performance to the tahoe.

the armada imo can out pull a tahoe. the torqe is much greater than a tahoe. ive owned 3 chevys. and i loved them. had 1 dodge my current car. stupid pos charger and ive put more workj into this car than i have combined with all my other cars every.

E/ . my girl is a tire manager at conrads. and a guy comes in religiously with a 2006 armada with over 200k on the dash dude says is runs like a champ still. also my owner of my company has a 2005 armada with almost 200k on it. said he owned a suburban before and treaded it in because it was costing him more money to repai than it was worth. also says the armada is a very tough dependable truck.

This post was edited by premo1985 on Nov 20 2015 04:14pm

ok get the armada

???

thanks for your irrelevant input

"Old 5.3" There's a reason it hasn't changed much. They are very dependable engines. There's TONS of vehicles with the 5.3 that are over 300k and running as strong as ever, they are just good.
When you ask and the vote is heavily in favor of a 5.3, there is probably good reason.
There is a reason they retain value, as well. Low mileage cheap ones are hard to find.
135k on a 5.3? Lol, cool it just got broke in, it's got 300k more.

This post was edited by R0B3RT on Nov 21 2015 03:12am