☰
d2jsp
Rules
Help
Forum Gold FAQ
Live Streams
Photo Gallery
Hourly Raffle
Ladder Slasher
Log In
Register
Log In
Register
Account Recovery
Resend Validation Email
d2jsp Forums
>
Off-Topic
>
Sports Coliseum
>
Motor Sports & Cars
>
Poll > C5 Turbo Kit Shootout > Twin Vs Single, Rear Vs Front Mount
1
2
Next
Add Reply
New Topic
New Poll
Views: 2700
Replies: 19
Track Topic
Guests cannot view or vote in polls. Please
register
or
login
.
BlueAndWhite
Member
Posts: 11,565
Joined: Jan 13 2008
Gold
:
224.25
#1
Feb 16 2014 07:34pm
Been looking at these and was wondering witch would you chose, i think the rear mount looks sexy even tough the turbos are tiny and it looks way easier to install.
upp twin turbo starts at 5699 and is mounted in the front wheel wells (kinda)
around 550 rwhp on 8 psi on ls1 engine
http://www.uppcos.com/index.php?cPath=22_24_43
hinson supercar single turbo starts around 4999 and is top mounted
505rwhp on ls2 engine at 9 psi
http://www.hinsonsupercars.com/p-44-hsc-c5-single-turbo-kit.aspx
sts twin turbo starts at 6999 and is rear mounted
469rwhp at 5 psi ans 568 at 9 psi with water meth injection on ls1 engine
http://ststurbo.com/build_my_kit.php
Avenger987
Member
Posts: 27,416
Joined: Sep 16 2006
Gold
:
69.69
#2
Feb 16 2014 07:52pm
rear turbo set ups always give me a woody
PeanutButter
Member
Posts: 16,769
Joined: Jun 21 2007
Gold
:
21,296.22
#3
Feb 16 2014 08:29pm
Hinson for sure.
WeePee
Member
Posts: 18,179
Joined: Jan 31 2007
Gold
:
6,864.11
#4
Feb 16 2014 08:40pm
Quote (Avenger987 @ Feb 16 2014 07:52pm)
rear turbo set ups always give me a woody
totally agree, no homo.
PeanutButter
Member
Posts: 16,769
Joined: Jun 21 2007
Gold
:
21,296.22
#5
Feb 16 2014 08:45pm
In terms of responsiveness you don't want a rear mount. I was going to put the squires on my C5Z until I did some research on them.
justin_618
Member
Posts: 25,041
Joined: Jan 16 2008
Gold
:
0.70
#6
Feb 16 2014 08:52pm
upp fender mounts are the way to go out of these. rear mounts dont really work so well.
OldAndyAndTheSea
Member
Posts: 12,628
Joined: Oct 7 2008
Gold
:
10.00
#7
Feb 16 2014 09:13pm
I like top mounts simply for the fact that inspection and repair is very easy. Agreed with the rest that I wouldn't go with a rear kit, despite how cool they look. Both the first two kits are a toss up for me.
Weab
Member
Posts: 80,637
Joined: Mar 25 2006
Gold
:
3,188.50
#8
Feb 16 2014 10:36pm
Hinson. No way I would run a rear mount kit
MrShowtime
Member
Posts: 17,080
Joined: Jun 5 2005
Gold
:
52,903.37
#9
Feb 17 2014 05:18am
UPP would be my vote. Theres a vendor on CF selling them with free shipping/80 lb injector upgrade at that same price (should you decide to go with them)
Killerme99
Member
Posts: 14,878
Joined: Jan 11 2007
Gold
:
46.00
#10
Feb 17 2014 10:17am
Are you stuck on boost or do you just want 500ish hp?
If anything you might want to look into some N/A setups.. 500whp is well within reason without boost. Its gonna run you almost as much $$ to get the same HP but it will be super reliable if done right and wont have half as much shit to go wrong.
For some reason spending $5K for a turbo kit + fuel sys + install + tuning + etc + etc for 150whp over stock doesn't seem worth while.
Im sure FMX can give you some great choices.. I am guessing you could make 500whp fairly easy with H/C/I + full bolt ons or just a cam + exhaust and some nitrous, etc.
Not to mention I think you would be surprised how different a 500whp turbo C5 is gonna feel vs a 500whp N/A one... world of difference.
Edit- What ever you do stay away from any rear mount kit... you will thank us later.
This post was edited by Killerme99 on Feb 17 2014 10:18am
Go Back To
Motor Sports & Cars
Topic List
1
2
Next
Add Reply
New Topic
New Poll
© 2003-2026 d2jsp
Contact