What Is The Most Beautiful Car In Your Opinion? - Topic

360

Banned

Posts: 5,459

Joined: Aug 25 2007

Gold: Locked

Trader: Scammer

Warn: 50%

#91

May 21 2008 08:46am

lamborghini reventon without a doubt :

650 hp only 20 will ever be built, 1.4 million us.

btw my dad has an 08 bmw m5 shit rapes 500hp for a realistic car haha

FMX_89

Member

Posts: 17,247

Joined: Oct 19 2007

Gold: 484.02

#92

May 22 2008 02:36am

Quote (PDrizzle89 @ Sat, May 17 2008, 10:58am)

integra type-r's held it down. their the fastest stock 4 cyl 1.8 liter car when they came out i actually think there even the fastest 4 cyl N/A stock car when they came out they do 14.7 with absolutely nothing done to them and in a 2549 lb car. and if they were stock tuned and ran on C16 they would do 14.3 or better esp since ive seen a bubble with a stock itr tuned running on c16 doing 13.7's... and i chose it because there just plain old sexy

I guess I come from a group where 14.3 with a tune on race gas is just slow. That's barely faster than an automatic SN95 mustang GT, which is the benchmark for slow.

VisshusFemme

Member

Posts: 3,585

Joined: Feb 4 2008

Gold: 47.45

#93

May 25 2008 07:13am

Quote (FMX_89 @ Thu, May 22 2008, 02:36am)

I guess I come from a group where 14.3 with a tune on race gas is just slow. That's barely faster than an automatic SN95 mustang GT, which is the benchmark for slow.

Yeah me as well......but everyone has opinions...

doyleo

Member

Posts: 3,248

Joined: Mar 21 2008

Gold: 2,721.01

#94

May 28 2008 02:18pm

Haha, but really:

Hmm im suprised how many people have chosen the enzo, i personally think it is not at all beautyful, so i have provided a link to one:
NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART (or people who dont like seeing a wrecked enzo xd)

http://www.forzarossa.nl/images/weblog_foto/wrecked_enzo.jpg

PDrizzle89

Member

Posts: 8,416

Joined: Nov 20 2005

Gold: 3,671.10

#95

May 30 2008 10:09am

Quote (FMX_89 @ Thu, May 22 2008, 04:36am)

I guess I come from a group where 14.3 with a tune on race gas is just slow. That's barely faster than an automatic SN95 mustang GT, which is the benchmark for slow.

ur running double the cylinders and at least double the size motor. were talking about 4 cyl motors not V8's that still use the same technology since the 50's which is funny cuz theres all motor hondas that run better times than V8's

BentNail

Member

Posts: 27,711

Joined: May 26 2006

Gold: 454.00

#96

May 30 2008 05:30pm

Quote (FMX_89 @ Thu, May 22 2008, 02:36am)

I guess I come from a group where 14.3 with a tune on race gas is just slow. That's barely faster than an automatic SN95 mustang GT, which is the benchmark for slow.

you just compaired an 8 cylinder to a 4 cylinder.

14 second stock for a 1.8 n/a 4 cylinder motor is fast.

FMX_89

Member

Posts: 17,247

Joined: Oct 19 2007

Gold: 484.02

#97

May 31 2008 02:01am

Yes, i compared it. I compared times. I don't care if you managed a 16.50 on a turbo 800cc 2 cylinder in a car. The time is all that matters. Just because something is smaller/inferior/whatever does not automatically give it a crutch. If you only have 4 cylinders you better be doing something to make it faster. Whether that is dropping weight or doing FI, it doesn't matter. Basically, I'm saying slow is slow. It doesn't matter what you use to get there.

CJzaW

Member

Posts: 3,003

Joined: Jun 16 2007

Gold: 1.08

#98

Jun 4 2008 09:40am

Quote (360 @ Wed, May 21 2008, 10:46am)

lamborghini reventon without a doubt :
http://images.europeancarweb.com/features/epcp_0709_12_z+lamborghini_reventon+front_left.jpg650 hp only 20 will ever be built, 1.4 million us.

btw my dad has an 08 bmw m5 shit rapes 500hp for a realistic car haha

that car is so nice

and yes 20 of these cars were built

jro1221

Member

Posts: 30,905

Joined: Feb 18 2007

Gold: 0.00

#99

Jun 4 2008 10:57am