Quote (Subwoofer @ Oct 2 2013 05:02pm)
yes...but not without just cause. the cause of his actions are still lacking evidence.
lol ya. sad thing is almost every article is labeled something like "psycho bikers attack suv" instead of "wreck on highway leads to crazy chase" or something like that.
maybe we watched different videos, because its clearly evident that the bikers were the aggressors...
you want just cause? i saw a biker assault the guys vehicle. as soon as he attacked his property, which the suv driver has the right to defend, let alone his family inside, his actions became justified. whether running over the biker was intentional or not, at that point in time it was irrelevant, he had an obligation to defend his family.
if there isnt any other video showing that the suv was the aggressor, which i havent seen as of yet, then with this video footage alone, the driver will be deemed innocent of any charges brought against his persons.
Quote (Subwoofer @ Oct 2 2013 05:07pm)
i generally don't either unless its something people are talking about or science/politic related.
hopefully there were some cameras somewhere that caught more video of what happened because that gopro video is useless for seeing what happened by the suv before he ran over people. for all we know 1 guy walked up and knocked on his window to ask him if they were okay and he panicked thinking he was going to be attacked.
unfortunately you cant make situations like this up. if what you said hypothetically happen, and the bikers were not at fault, the suv driver was an idiot who overreacted, doesnt matter. no proof. this video alone incriminates the bikers and justified the suv drivers actions.
unless other footage is revealed, sorry bikers, the suv guy is walking from any and all charges.
This post was edited by Sopranos on Oct 2 2013 03:17pm