That's the 2010. I'm talking about the 2013 which is pumping out 470 compared to the 425 the 2010 put out.

I do like the appearance of the challenger but I think the 2013's are just a tad bit out of the price range of the mustang gt's. My only beef with the challenger is that they are fat : / 5300 curb weight is what I saw after a brief google. That is certainly not lightweight

This post was edited by Epicexecution on Jan 26 2013 07:30pm

http://autos.aol.com/cars-Dodge-Challenger-2013/specs/

yeah and about 350lbs lighter for the v6 lol. thats a chunk of meat but i prefer their looks over the mustang and camaro

Idk why it matters to people if their parents bought them their car. It's his dad's money so let him spend it on what he wants. (not saying his parents did buy it) I'm pretty sure if it was your dad with the money he would also buy you a car to. Yeah my dad bought my truck and I don't have a problem telling it because it dont care what you or anyone has to say about it. Also I don't like mustangs for the simple fact I don't like them. They're not appealing to me and I'm not a ford guy. That doesn't make me a hater or jealous of them. I don't care if the car is faster then my truck or not. I have a truck that is appealing to me and I like it thats what matters to me.

which made it still slower than the mustang gt....just not as slow as it used to be.

motortend found he new models to run 13 seconds which is .3 seconds faster..but still .3 seconds slower than the GT.

Thank you for pointing out his mistake before i did lol

Cool, I didn't know the past mattered right now.

it's still currently slower.

a little more hp doesn't change the fact its a fatty fat fat fat of a car.

This post was edited by Subwoofer on Jan 26 2013 07:59pm

Past, present and future kid


And this is the reason why its horrifically slower

Do your parents give you $$$?

Still ChaosSoul>you though lol