Quote (CuttingEdge @ Jun 3 2017 05:10pm)
More fallacy.
Do you even argue bro?
I'm gonna pull the "fallacy fallacy" and walk away from you, because you don't have the brain cells to conduct discourse without relying on horribly flawed logic.
Lancer > Civic all day every fuckin day.
Mivec > these new shit motors Honda's making
If you're TRUELY worried about spending an additional 500$ over the course of the car's life, like if 500$ is REALLY that much to you, then yeah buy a Honda.
If you want a faster, better, sexier, better suspension setup, better build quality, better warrantee car, you buy a Lancer.
Okay, this is what you want. This is relating to an UBER car based on base trims.
Gas Mileage:
Lancer: 27/34 Civic: 32/42 winner: Civic
Horse Power:
Lancer: 148 Civic: 158 Winner: CIVIC
Torqe:
Lancer: 145 Civic: 138 Wiinner LANCER
Civic does 0-60 quicker, if you care.
Sexier is in the eyes of the beholder, I don't care for either of them.
Better build? I don't believe you.
Yes, Mitsubishi does offer a better warranty, however, on every single "overall" rating scale, the civic rates higher.
Just google best uber cars, you won't find any from Mitsubishi.
I don't understand your thought process and how you actually believe a lancer is a better choice. Statistically, it's not.
Uber drivers, who drive as a profession, DO CARE about cost savings. Their vehicle is THEIR BUSINESS.
Seems like you're a bit hypocritical with your fallacy crap.
This post was edited by stupidkid282 on Jun 3 2017 12:18pm