ignore them

that one looks good

they are gunna troll you whatever you post

clear headlights on an old car can be a good sign of decent maintanence

Ok thanks

Not true at all. Most people here hate the "stanced" look. That last one isn't as bad but the rear still has too much negative camber.

i wouldnt really call that last one stanced

just has nice looking fitment

stanced is cancer



thats cancer

It has hardly any camber, bmws already have -5° give or take from factory in the rear then add in the fact it's lowered a lot and it will naturally camber a little more. It probably has no kit or anything to give it more camber than what would just happen.

This post was edited by TheBroodwich on Jun 14 2015 11:45am

I don't care if it has a kit on it or not. Of course lowering naturally induces more negative camber. You have to adjust that back out of it. My Trans Am is slammed and i was able to get back to good performance alignment spec of -1.5°. You have lost your mind if you think the rear of that car has an acceptable/normal camber.





It has a bunch of negative camber in the rear and the tires are stretched. It's a mild case but i'd still call it stanced. It's pretty clear that is the look they are going for.

Reverse image search that picture and you get...


Stanceworks

Ha!
GOT EMM

Still clean, at least one good car came from a shit style