d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Motor Sports & Cars > Is This Worth It? > Mustang
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,047
Joined: Nov 10 2005
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Jun 11 2013 11:46pm
The first mustang isnt bad but kinda pricey for that high of mileage.problems i'd worry about is with it being a 5 speed guy might've drove it like he was racing all the time who knows what might go wrong with it. u still mgiht check it out and take it for a drive. just remember that people always price stuff higher then they will accept for it.

also the bronco seems nice and will be fun with having a 351 but remember if ur wanting something with decent gas mileage u might check out what that is getting. I know my moms only got like 15 with street thread tires on it but her's is a bit older and was carbuerated.

just be smart about what u get dont dive right into something right away. make sure to test drive it and check every little thing.

Member
Posts: 49,220
Joined: Oct 24 2003
Gold: 0.00
Jun 12 2013 12:44am
bronco never EVER came with a 4 cyl

just a i6 and a v8

even in the early 66-77 years

66-77 they offered it with the 170 and 200 in line 6 289 and the 302 v8

in 78/79 when the became fullsize they had a 351 and a 400

80-96 when they stopped making them they offered a 300 inline 6, a 302 v8 and a 351 v8
Member
Posts: 29,723
Joined: Jun 11 2007
Gold: 279.52
Jun 12 2013 01:34am
Quote (KoJ @ Jun 12 2013 06:44am)
bronco never EVER came with a 4 cyl

just a i6 and a v8

even in the early 66-77 years

66-77 they offered it with the 170 and 200 in line 6  289 and the 302 v8

in 78/79 when the became fullsize they had a 351 and a 400

80-96 when they stopped making them they offered a 300 inline 6, a 302 v8 and a 351 v8


maybe im thinking of the ranger.
Member
Posts: 13,420
Joined: Apr 12 2006
Gold: 3.75
Jun 12 2013 01:43am
id give 750 for that stang tops
Member
Posts: 49,220
Joined: Oct 24 2003
Gold: 0.00
Jun 12 2013 02:06am
Quote (AkuuZ @ Jun 12 2013 12:34am)
maybe im thinking of the ranger.


ranger did come with 4 cyls
Member
Posts: 4,719
Joined: Dec 16 2010
Gold: 19.87
Jun 12 2013 10:16am
Bought my 99 v6 with 170k for 3000, and I know I overpaid... Wouldn't touch that 98 with a 10 foot pole.
Member
Posts: 8,918
Joined: May 13 2005
Gold: 714.57
Jun 12 2013 04:33pm
Why would you get such an older body style at that price? Get 2000+ ... But, do take our advice and get a gas sipper. Drove a 2000 v6 mustang for years, into a 2010 cobalt (bought @ 13k miles) that gets fantastic fuel mileage, couldn't have made a better decision.
Member
Posts: 32,047
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,864.00
Jun 13 2013 04:10pm
Quote (dookeyfresh @ Jun 11 2013 10:31pm)


It's been wrecked.
Member
Posts: 32,047
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,864.00
Jun 13 2013 04:14pm
Quote (dookeyfresh @ Jun 12 2013 12:26am)
94 Eddie bauer. I used to have one was a 351 ool


Unless somebody put that engine in it, that model came with a v6.
"The 4.0 L pushrod (245 CID; 4009 cc) version, although produced in Cologne, Germany, was only fitted to American vehicles.[1] The OHV engine was produced until 2000 and was used in the Ford Explorer."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FordCologneV6engine#4.0


Quote (KoJ @ Jun 12 2013 01:44am)
bronco never EVER came with a 4 cyl

just a i6 and a v8

even in the early 66-77 years

66-77 they offered it with the 170 and 200 in line 6  289 and the 302 v8

in 78/79 when the became fullsize they had a 351 and a 400

80-96 when they stopped making them they offered a 300 inline 6, a 302 v8 and a 351 v8


I'd like proof they ever came stock with a 351 v8 in 1994. I can't find any....second gen had the 5.0 in 1995.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FordExplorer#Firstgeneration.281991.E2.80.931994.29

This post was edited by said_aouita on Jun 13 2013 04:18pm
Member
Posts: 8,671
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 11,961.01
Jun 13 2013 04:53pm
Why do you want a v6 mustang so badly... Not the best budget to be picky with...
Go Back To Motor Sports & Cars Topic List
Prev12345Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll