Not sure why you keep posting this, it's such a ridiculous statement with nothing to back it up--and I'm sure most, if not everyone here, would disagree.

No where did I ever post that M3's were rare vehicles. All I've stated is that calling an M3 a more common car than a GT is idiotic.

This post was edited by 0berst on Jan 2 2013 06:46pm

didnt say more common, i said as common.

ive seen more 2013 m3s than i have 2013 mustang gts.

and calling your car a "exponentially superior car" is ludicrous. maybe superior in its price tag, but performance? nope sorry, ive provided you the numbers already, youre just unwilling to listen.

You definitely implied they were more common, because you claim to see more of them than GT's.

Have you ever even been inside of a fully loaded M3? The Mustang is a shitbox when it comes to any styling and features, both interior and exterior. And it's laughable that you're still hung up on the idea that a 0-60 time makes a car superior.

hp? mustang
torque? mustang
0-60 and 1/4? mustang

ill give the interior to the m3 because thats why the price is high, exterior? i hate euro body styling so nty on the idea that an m3 looks better

handling is equal as well. so performance wise the mustang is a much much better choice...because it cost half as much as the m3.

the only argument for the m3 is that well...its an m3. if you want to spend money on something because its a bmw m3 go right ahead...just don't pretend like you are getting your moneys worth in performance aspects.

beautifully stated

I was going to type out a huge reply about this and that... but this thread needs to die.
No one cares about your M3 you've got leased.
No one cares about the BRZFT86FRS.
I like mustangs.... but give it a rest ffs. They aren't made to be on par with a 350k$ car. They are made to be really fun, AND affordable. Let them be that.
Anything other than the topic being discussed in the original post should be reported.
/thread.

You do realize that a Boss 302 runs pretty much dead even (if not faster) on a track than a M3 for like half the price?
Id take a well done mustangs exterior over a M3 any day. The BMW probably takes it for interior, but for double the price I would hope so.

And the "rarity" depends on your area. I worked all summer in Atlanta (Buckhead and Duluth, both are rich areas) and saw lots more M3s than I ever did 5.0s or Boss 302s. Lots of the new BMW 650 or whatever it is too. And lots of Panameras.

I work in downtown Houston and know a couple of locations I can find specific m3s parked lol. But the 5.0s that are down here are modded so its more interesting than just a regular GT

I would drive a BMW M3 over a Mustang GT any and every day of the week.
But if that Mustang GT came with 30,000 dollars in cash in the trunk (the price difference between the 2 cars) I would take the mustang.