d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Motor Sports & Cars > The Official Honda Discussion Thread > Gfg
Prev1254255256257258688Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 22,360
Joined: Feb 20 2008
Gold: 600.69
Warn: 100%
Dec 23 2009 06:49pm
Quote (AkuuZ @ Dec 23 2009 04:47pm)
well lets see, the Honda CTR does the nurburgring in 8:47

the 2010 Camaro does it in 8:20

now the 2004 GTO is a Bit slower than the camaro, a bit lighter and handles about the same, the camaro hadles just a little bit better
the GTO and the New camaro have the same chassis, the camaros is just an upgraded version of it

now with that being said i would put my GTO around 8:45-9 min (they havent really tested it on the Nurburgring from what i can see)

so i would say the civic and my gto is around the same

now they make some godly suspension for the GTO from peddlers, making the .85 skidpad stock to about a 1.02 skidpad

so yes your civic does handle better than my GTO, but the quicker acceleration and faster "strait line" speed makes up for it


I would say the old civic type Rs would outhandle your GTO but his handles fucking horribly

fwd car with a solid rear axle = fail
Member
Posts: 8,519
Joined: May 4 2007
Gold: 1,255.00
Dec 23 2009 06:51pm
Quote (Four20 @ Dec 24 2009 12:44am)
the FN2 is not faster than the EP3 atleast on most tracks. the EP3 has fully independent rear suspension. for some reason honda europe stuck a solid beam rear axle on your car. fully independent double wishbone rear suspension is far superior to a solid beam on a race track.

i also have the episode of top gear where they compare the 2, they fn2 clearly does not handle as well as the ep3.


wuat?

Im sure i just said the EP3 was faster than the FN2.

Im sure I also said the nurburgring lap time was done it an EG, the FN2 is quicker than the EG...

I seem to be repeating myself.
Member
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Jan 17 2008
Gold: 88.00
Dec 23 2009 06:54pm
Quote (Monster666 @ Dec 23 2009 06:44pm)
you can never make a V black engine have the same power band as an inline engine period

if you could, there would be no V blocks and inlines because everything would be the fucking same thing


im not saying u can make them the exact same, obviously there are characteristics V8's have that 4 bangers dont and vise versa. but there are 4 bangers made that redline at 6k or less and have very close hp and torque curves instead of the spreed aprate hp and torque curves that say honda engines have. u can design any engine no matter the size to have a low rpm power band or a high rpm power band. neither is limited to any kind of engine 4 banger or V8.

keep in mind i am speaking purely about the hp and torque curves and the rpm at which they max at. non of this has anything to do with total power output.


Quote (wKa_MatT @ Dec 23 2009 06:51pm)
wuat?

Im sure i just said the EP3 was faster than the FN2.

Im sure I also said the nurburgring lap time was done it an EG, the FN2 is quicker than the EG...

I seem to be repeating myself.


u are right i am a dumbass or dyslexic or something.



This post was edited by Four20 on Dec 23 2009 06:55pm
Member
Posts: 22,360
Joined: Feb 20 2008
Gold: 600.69
Warn: 100%
Dec 23 2009 06:56pm
Quote (Four20 @ Dec 23 2009 04:54pm)
im not saying u can make them the exact same, obviously there are characteristics V8's have that 4 bangers dont and vise versa. but there are 4 bangers made that redline at 6k or less and have very close hp and torque curves instead of the spreed aprate hp and torque curves that say honda engines have. u can design any engine no matter the size to have a low rpm power band or a high rpm power band. neither is limited to any kind of engine 4 banger or V8.

keep in mind i am speaking purely about the hp and torque curves and the rpm at which they max at. non of this has anything to do with total power output.


yes you can obviously modify them for certain things like you brought up f1 racing etc etc but overall thats how v8s work and that is why most v8s made do not make (or care) about 100hp/liter. its really not an indication of anything but state of tune
Member
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Jan 17 2008
Gold: 88.00
Dec 23 2009 07:12pm
Quote (Monster666 @ Dec 23 2009 06:56pm)
yes you can obviously modify them for certain things like you brought up f1 racing etc etc but overall thats how v8s work and that is why most v8s made do not make (or care) about 100hp/liter.  its really not an indication of anything but state of tune


once again its not most V8's it is american V8's, many other companies make small displacement V8's with high rpm powerbands. an engines state of tune is very important, just by looking at that and weather its N/A or not can tell u almost everything u need to know about the engine without looking at the other stats. u can generally determine that an engine with 100hp + per liter N/A is an engine designed for a track it will have a compression ratio higher than 10:1 and many times higher than 11:1. and will make its make max hp around 8-9k rpms.

im not talking about modifying an engine to make it have a high or low powerband. this is something that is best taken into consideration when designing the engine. some N/A 4 bangers are designed to hive high rpm powerbands and some redline at 6k or less and make just as much of not more torque than hp.

u make max hp at higher rpms and u make max torque at low rpms this is just how it works generally. take american V8s for example they make very close to the same amount of torque as hp if not more. the reason for this is not because they make more torque but because engines make less hp at lower rpms. if they where designed for higher rpm use they could make quit a bit more hp and about the same amount of torque.
Member
Posts: 22,360
Joined: Feb 20 2008
Gold: 600.69
Warn: 100%
Dec 23 2009 07:16pm
Quote (Four20 @ Dec 23 2009 05:12pm)
once again its not most V8's it is american V8's, many other companies make small displacement V8's with high rpm powerbands. an engines state of tune is very important, just by looking at that and weather its N/A or not can tell u almost everything u need to know about the engine without looking at the other stats. u can generally determine that an engine with 100hp + per liter N/A is an engine designed for a track it will have a compression ratio higher than 10:1 and many times higher than 11:1. and will make its make max hp around 8-9k rpms.

im not talking about modifying an engine to make it have a high or low powerband. this is something that is best taken into consideration when designing the engine. some N/A 4 bangers are designed to hive high rpm powerbands and some redline at 6k or less and make just as much of not more torque than hp.

u make max hp at higher rpms and u make max torque at low rpms this is just how it works generally. take american V8s for example they make very close to the same amount of torque as hp if not more. the reason for this is not because they make more torque but because engines make less hp at lower rpms. if they where designed for higher rpm use they could make quit a bit more hp and about the same amount of torque.


low displacement and rpm range help but it doesn't change the power range between the 2

its like saying you can make a 4 stroke engine act like a 2 stroke, sure you could do a bunch of shit to it and make it similar, but it well never really act the same
Member
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Jan 17 2008
Gold: 88.00
Dec 23 2009 07:30pm
Quote (Monster666 @ Dec 23 2009 07:16pm)
low displacement and rpm range help but it doesn't change the power range between the 2

its like saying you can make a 4 stroke engine act like a 2 stroke, sure you could do a bunch of shit to it and make it similar, but it well never really act the same


not sure exactly wwhat u are saying. but yes u can change the rpm range between the torque and hp.

im dont know a whole hell of a lot about drag racing but i know there are N/A class's. i guarantee u there are high displacement american V8's running in those class's that hit max torque about 5k and max hp at 8k+ depending on the overall stat of tune.

like i siad with the knowlage u can make any engine have a low rpm power band say 6k redline with max hp just before that or a high rpm power band with max hp at 8k+. if honda wanted to they could make 2.0 liter 4 bangers that make about 150 ft lbs and 150 hp at a 6k rpm redline but they choose not to and i for one am glad.

everyone always says honda engines lack torque. well its the same as the american v8 example i stated in the last post. its not that they make less torque its that they make more power at higher rpms. my engine for example makes 160 hp at like 6.5k and 140 ft lbs at like 5k. thats not that big of diff between hp and torque, but the same engine in a higher state of tune in the type R makes the same 140 ft lbs at like 5k and 200+ hp at 7.5k+. so why not have the same amount of torque at the same approximate rpm and then have even more hp at a higher rpm where u can really make use of it because the torque drops off allowing for more traction and HP to the ground.



yea yea i know tl;dr bla bla....

This post was edited by Four20 on Dec 23 2009 07:35pm
Banned
Posts: 48,361
Joined: Apr 7 2007
Gold: Locked
Trader: Scammer
Warn: 60%
Dec 24 2009 10:49pm
I dont like the new civics...at all
Member
Posts: 29,723
Joined: Jun 11 2007
Gold: 279.52
Dec 24 2009 10:55pm
Quote (Avoid @ Dec 25 2009 04:49am)
I dont like the new civics...at all


god your sig is so gay
Banned
Posts: 5,547
Joined: Sep 20 2009
Gold: 56.00
Warn: 70%
Dec 24 2009 10:57pm
Quote (AkuuZ @ Dec 25 2009 12:55am)
god your sig is so gay


'least he's representin??? ...lol
Go Back To Motor Sports & Cars Topic List
Prev1254255256257258688Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll