d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Motor Sports & Cars > Sounds Sexy
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,671
Joined: Mar 23 2007
Gold: 605.14
Feb 25 2013 06:18pm
Quote (JDH @ Feb 25 2013 05:50pm)
its nowhere close to a true hemisperical combustion chamber. and besides, ford had true hemi heads before dodge so keep bragging on your "hemi in name only" dodge charger. its nothing more than a sticker to get fanboys to buy their cars. its like putting vtec on your civic its for the fanboys


the slowest dodge hemi stock is 5.5sec 0-60 with a top speed over 150, and the fastest vtech stock is over 6.1 sec 0-60 and under 135mph top speed.

if you wanna compare apples to oranges then so will i lol.

as for who had hemi first, pipe and fiat had it waaaaay before ford (early 1900's sometime).... yur point?

its not who had it first, its who made it the best. B)

Quote (jimmyhoud @ Feb 25 2013 12:37pm)
What is a hemi? It's a motor that was sloganed for having hemispherical heads... Find me a motor without one.... and i'm here to tell you, those heads on your "hemi" there are nothing close to those found on a 426.

p.s. What compression ratio does one run with a 50% concave?? rofl 2:1?


i dont think you get it, obviously, the larger the chamber / the more air and fuel that can burn (crossflow type configuration in modern hemis) the more power you can get. (vs the old wedge hemi's)

a dodge hemi, with a large concave cylinder head hemi, will make a hell of a lot more power top end then one with a concave that barely breaks under the surface of the head.

the larger the concave, the more air/fuel mixture you get, and the more power you can potentially make.

hence why dodge/chrysler hemi's have 2 spark plugs per cylinder cuz one plug isnt enough to ignite all of it efficiently

hemi's arnt emmissions friendly and dont have the greatest low end power but breath easily at the top end, which, if you are racing it, is where you want it.. unless of course, you are running 1/8 mile or some vaginal crap like that. :P

This post was edited by TURBO_DODGE on Feb 25 2013 06:24pm
Member
Posts: 14,878
Joined: Jan 11 2007
Gold: 46.00
Feb 25 2013 07:46pm
:zzz:
Member
Posts: 16,856
Joined: Jan 16 2008
Gold: 1.43
Feb 25 2013 08:52pm
wheres the video so we can hear how shitty this sounds?
Member
Posts: 16,671
Joined: Mar 23 2007
Gold: 605.14
Feb 25 2013 08:56pm
Quote (PiKaPo @ Feb 25 2013 08:52pm)
wheres the video so we can hear how shitty this sounds?


not makin one till i get a good cam / there isnt ice and snow all over the roads.

speaking of which, getting another 5 inches tonight /tomoorrow
Member
Posts: 2,594
Joined: Jul 13 2008
Gold: 115.00
Feb 25 2013 10:43pm
Quote (TURBO_DODGE @ Feb 26 2013 12:18am)
the slowest dodge hemi stock is 5.5sec 0-60 with a top speed over 150, and the fastest vtech stock is over 6.1 sec 0-60 and under 135mph top speed.

if you wanna compare apples to oranges then so will i lol.

as for who had hemi first, pipe and fiat had it waaaaay before ford (early 1900's sometime).... yur point?

its not who had it first, its who made it the best.  B)



i dont think you get it, obviously, the larger the chamber / the more air and fuel that can burn (crossflow type configuration in modern hemis) the more power you can get. (vs the old wedge hemi's)

a dodge hemi, with a large concave cylinder head hemi, will make a hell of a lot more power top end then one with a concave that barely breaks under the surface of the head.

the larger the concave, the more air/fuel mixture you get, and the more power you can potentially make.

hence why dodge/chrysler hemi's have 2 spark plugs per cylinder cuz one plug isnt enough to ignite all of it efficiently

hemi's arnt emmissions friendly and dont have the greatest low end power but breath easily at the top end, which, if you are racing it, is where you want it.. unless of course, you are running 1/8 mile or some vaginal crap like that. :P


stock s2000, 0 to 60 in 5.4, top speed 150.

stock nsx type r, 0 to 60 4.4 seconds, 175?

that isnt even all of them its just the most obvious ones, do you just make up numbers that seem real too you or you dont research before you make comments about things?
Member
Posts: 16,671
Joined: Mar 23 2007
Gold: 605.14
Feb 25 2013 10:51pm
Quote (KoOkies @ Feb 25 2013 10:43pm)
stock s2000, 0 to 60 in 5.4, top speed 150.

stock nsx type r, 0 to 60 4.4 seconds, 175?

that isnt even all of them its just the most obvious ones, do you just make up numbers that seem real too you or you dont research before you make comments about things?


if you read the thing after i posted those, i copy/pasted them from a 0-60 times site.

also i see you didint read the list cuz it goes by year..

what year s2000 and nsx are you refering too? probably not the ones i posted
Member
Posts: 2,594
Joined: Jul 13 2008
Gold: 115.00
Feb 25 2013 10:55pm
Quote (TURBO_DODGE @ Feb 26 2013 04:51am)
if you read the thing after i posted those, i copy/pasted them from a 0-60 times site.

also i see you didint read the list cuz it goes by year..

what year s2000 and nsx are you refering too? probably not the ones i posted


every single nsx ever made has been quicker 0 to 60 than 6 seconds.

1991 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 5.7 Quarter mile 14.2

1992 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 5.5 Quarter mile 13.7

1993 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 5.5 Quarter mile 13.7

1994 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.4

1995 Acura NSX-T 0-60 mph 5.5 Quarter mile 13.5

1996 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 5.1 Quarter mile 13.6

1996 Acura NSX-T 0-60 mph 5.7 Quarter mile 14.1

1997 Acura NSX-T 0-60 mph 4.7 Quarter mile 13.1

1998 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 4.8 Quarter mile 13.1

1999 Acura NSX Alex Zanardi Edition 0-60 mph 4.6 Quarter mile 12.9

2001 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 4.4 Quarter mile 12.7

2002 Acura NSX 0-60 mph 4.7 Quarter mile 13.2

2014 New Acura NSX 0-60 To Be Released



2000 Honda S2000 0-60 mph 5.7 Quarter mile 14.0

2003 Honda S2000 0-60 mph 6.2 Quarter mile 14.7

2004 Honda S2000 0-60 mph 5.7 Quarter mile 14.0

2006 Honda S2000 0-60 mph 5.4 Quarter mile 13.8

2008 Honda S2000 CR 0-60 mph 5.6 Quarter mile 14.2

2009 Honda S2000 Edition 100 0-60 mph 6.1
Member
Posts: 8,671
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 11,961.01
Feb 25 2013 11:45pm
Quote (KoOkies @ Feb 26 2013 04:43am)
stock s2000, 0 to 60 in 5.4, top speed 150.

stock nsx type r, 0 to 60 4.4 seconds, 175?

that isnt even all of them its just the most obvious ones, do you just make up numbers that seem real too you or you dont research before you make comments about things?


lol no please let him continue to think that his obese car is fast just because of the engine
Member
Posts: 21,749
Joined: Oct 2 2006
Gold: 34.36
Feb 26 2013 12:02am
Quote (TURBO_DODGE @ Feb 25 2013 05:18pm)
the slowest dodge hemi stock is 5.5sec 0-60 with a top speed over 150, and the fastest vtech stock is over 6.1 sec 0-60 and under 135mph top speed.

if you wanna compare apples to oranges then so will i lol.

as for who had hemi first, pipe and fiat had it waaaaay before ford (early 1900's sometime).... yur point?

its not who had it first, its who made it the best.  B)



i dont think you get it, obviously, the larger the chamber / the more air and fuel that can burn (crossflow type configuration in modern hemis) the more power you can get. (vs the old wedge hemi's)

a dodge hemi, with a large concave cylinder head hemi, will make a hell of a lot more power top end then one with a concave that barely breaks under the surface of the head.

the larger the concave, the more air/fuel mixture you get, and the more power you can potentially make.

hence why dodge/chrysler hemi's have 2 spark plugs per cylinder cuz one plug isnt enough to ignite all of it efficiently

hemi's arnt emmissions friendly and dont have the greatest low end power but breath easily at the top end, which, if you are racing it, is where you want it.. unless of course, you are running 1/8 mile or some vaginal crap like that. :P


You're correct here. However. with a 50% concave combustion chamber your piston is going to have to look like a penis to get any compression what so ever. You were a little generous with your previous statement of 50% lol
Member
Posts: 8,671
Joined: Jul 9 2007
Gold: 11,961.01
Feb 26 2013 05:18pm
Quote (TURBO_DODGE @ Feb 26 2013 02:56am)
not makin one till i get a good cam / there isnt ice and snow all over the roads.

speaking of which, getting another 5 inches tonight /tomoorrow


aka sounds like shit
Go Back To Motor Sports & Cars Topic List
Prev1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll