Yeah....

if it received any power bump....it would only need more torque.


Correct English.


i'm not going to sit here at act like the car is perfect, but it's literally fine the way it is. Changes are welcomed, but it's still fine.

There's nothing new on the market that's anything like it (affordable), aside from the miata.



So much crying from you guys. so much crying.

Everyone's afraid of the little brz that could

This post was edited by stupidkid282 on Nov 10 2017 09:02pm

/truth

Hairdressercar>

more like cupcake bakery deliverer.

Torque increase = power increase

Just saying

the issue with that is if it has enough power your implying it does not need anymore power.

saying that you welcomes more power infact means that you think it needs more power.

a good analogy is a plate of food. either you finish your food and your still hungry or you finish your food and your satisfied (or even possible ate too much and your feeling sick)

and you cant guess what is enough for someone else, 450 may be enough for you, or even too much, but may not be enough for someone else.

People are never satisfied.

And there in lies the human condition

You ever consider it's because it's a shit concept?
Confirmed by the BRZs poor sales and the fact that only fuqbois such as yourself would ever consider owning one as they come from the factory?

No.

This car is simply not for you.

If you don’t appreciate what the Miata brings, you can’t appreciate this car either. It’s a niche car. The sales are not even far off from the Miata.

What’s “shitty” about an inexpensive sports car, weighing under 2800 lbs, 100 hp per liter on a n/a engine, small, rwd, and generally aesthetically pleasing?

There is nothing “shitty” about the above.

However, and here’s where the agreement comes in, it is more typical that mainstream consumers care more about high hp amounts, and don’t care about driver’s cars. That doesn’t make the positive qualities of the brz shitty in any way.


I’m not going to take the word of people on jsp, over all of the involvement I’ve had with this car since pre 2012. I value the opinions of people who own, and people who don’t own that appreciate what it is.

Again, this car is exactly what it was hyped to be, and not once was it “supposed” to be a high hp output car.

We will see where toyobaru goes with generation 2, whether they try to cater to a larger group, or continue upgrading he car for the track as they did with the 2017 facelift.

Again, personally, I feel zero satisfaction from a larger car with over double the hp. Zero satisfaction. And I’m not going to sit here and let some clowns tell me otherwise.

There’s nothing wrong with people wanting to choose larger cars with more hp over the brz, but that doesn’t mean there is anything wrong with people wanting a smaller car with less hp.

I voluntarily choose to drive a lower hp car because I value the small size and weight (and the mpg is a decent bonus).

I don’t even know what you’re trying to accomplish, I purchased the exact car I desired. I could have very easily purchased something faster, but I didn’t. That’s not what I wanted.

This post was edited by stupidkid282 on Nov 12 2017 09:04am

What the fuck are you blathering about?

No one wants you to choose a larger more powerful car.


We are saying the BRZ needs to stay the exact same size that it is and have some power added to make it MORE fun. That's celebrating what it already is you bumblefuck.


You are literally arguing with thin air now. You also referenced hp/liter which I called way back in the beginning. Specific output will never be a talking point outside of engineering awards. It doesn't matter if you make 200hp from 2L when you compare it to the same car making 300hp from 3.6L. Displacement is not directly related to engine weight.

This post was edited by FMX_89 on Nov 12 2017 09:29am