Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Apr 22 2015 02:40pm)
You think the gap between the ECUs of 5 years ago and today are a huge bridge? Imagine the first guy that had to figure out how to tune an EFI car the year they came out.
I feel like the companies don't realize how large of a basis there is for aftermarket builds, on almost any car...
I'd just tear the fucking thing out and put a standalone in it if its that big of a deal.. Imagine they told you that you could not, under risk of persecution, continue working on your F-body..
I can't even, its actually frustrating me thinking about it.
Yes. I own 2 gen III GM PCMs, a gen IV GM ECU, and now a gen V GM ECU. The first guy to figure out efi tuning did not have a very steep learning curve because the maps and parameters were rudimentary and mimicked a carb. The Gen III PCMs I own have about 150 tables that can be changed. Many of them are adders and multipliers for other tables. It is pretty complicated. The Gen IV stuff has around 200 tables and another 300 parameters for the automatic transmissions. The TCM is inside the transmission, which is sealed for life. If you change the wrong tables or input incorrect values you can brick the TCM and your trans is scrap. The gen V ECU is completely different. It has nearly double the tables and works on a completely different architecture. In the past, power delivery was a function of TPS voltage, atmospheric sensors, and algorithms. Now when you press the throttle pedal you aren't commanding a linear TPS voltage. The ECU uses something called driver commanded torque. It reads how much torque you are requesting at any moment and filters that through a series of complicated tables that actually have equations in their cells instead of a basic xyz map.
The few guys that have figured out GEN V tuning and really understand it have engineering degrees and are at the top of their profession. These ECUs have been out almost 2 years and GM gave several shops development products before they were released. Even the companies coding the tuning software don't fully understand every table and how it interacts with others. Many are left invisible.
It's legos vs kinex vs building a circuit board blindfolded.
I still think we should be allowed to try. When people see how complicated they are they will choose not to change things. My silverado isn't getting tuned even though i have tuning software because the risks outweigh the rewards.
This post was edited by FMX_89 on Apr 22 2015 02:22pm