d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > Sports Coliseum > Motor Sports & Cars > Go To Jail For Repairing Your Own Car?
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 18,699
Joined: Apr 24 2007
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2015 01:40pm
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 22 2015 07:21pm)
Most of it seems to center around the ECU and the advanced features it toggles on and off. You would still be able to accessorize as you please. You can bet your candy ass the EPA goons will be all over this. Passing something that puts tuning software developers out of business would eliminate aftermarket engine mods and emissions deletion components in 1 pen stroke. We saw them go after the guy building the SMARTY brand of diesel tuners for being the most popular tuner used to delete DPF and EGR from new cummins trucks. There was quickly and chinese copy being sold. This is bad news overall. I will admit the new ECUs are far more complicated than stuff from 5-6 years ago. They are now beyond the grasp of probably half the professional tuners out there. They have a point, but in the past that would make new space in the market for people that do understand it to rise up.

This is the latest step in trying to toddler proof America.



You think the gap between the ECUs of 5 years ago and today are a huge bridge? Imagine the first guy that had to figure out how to tune an EFI car the year they came out.

I feel like the companies don't realize how large of a basis there is for aftermarket builds, on almost any car...

I'd just tear the fucking thing out and put a standalone in it if its that big of a deal.. Imagine they told you that you could not, under risk of persecution, continue working on your F-body..

I can't even, its actually frustrating me thinking about it.
Member
Posts: 21,749
Joined: Oct 2 2006
Gold: 34.36
Apr 22 2015 01:43pm
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 22 2015 12:21pm)
Most of it seems to center around the ECU and the advanced features it toggles on and off. You would still be able to accessorize as you please. You can bet your candy ass the EPA goons will be all over this. Passing something that puts tuning software developers out of business would eliminate aftermarket engine mods and emissions deletion components in 1 pen stroke. We saw them go after the guy building the SMARTY brand of diesel tuners for being the most popular tuner used to delete DPF and EGR from new cummins trucks. There was quickly and chinese copy being sold. This is bad news overall. I will admit the new ECUs are far more complicated than stuff from 5-6 years ago. They are now beyond the grasp of probably half the professional tuners out there. They have a point, but in the past that would make new space in the market for people that do understand it to rise up.

This is the latest step in trying to toddler proof America.


You hit the nail on the head. I couldn't agree more.

Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Apr 22 2015 12:40pm)
You think the gap between the ECUs of 5 years ago and today are a huge bridge? Imagine the first guy that had to figure out how to tune an EFI car the year they came out.

I feel like the companies don't realize how large of a basis there is for aftermarket builds, on almost any car...

I'd just tear the fucking thing out and put a standalone in it if its that big of a deal.. Imagine they told you that you could not, under risk of persecution, continue working on your F-body..

I can't even, its actually frustrating me thinking about it.


There are a few people who have done it before the tuners came out on the 13+ trucks.

The total cost for a standalone operating system and the tuning and configuration to get it running was around 60,000 dollars. It's not just the ECU that needs to be changed. It's every other computer in the truck that co-exists with the ECU to make the vehicle run by it's pre-determined specs. Which is half of the truck.

This post was edited by jimmyhoud on Apr 22 2015 01:45pm
Member
Posts: 18,699
Joined: Apr 24 2007
Gold: 0.00
Apr 22 2015 01:48pm
Quote (jimmyhoud @ Apr 22 2015 07:43pm)
You hit the nail on the head. I couldn't agree more.



There are a few people who have done it before the tuners came out on the 13+ trucks.

The total cost for a standalone operating system and the tuning and configuration to get it running was around 60,000 dollars. It's not just the ECU that needs to be changed. It's every other computer in the truck that co-exists with the ECU to make the vehicle run by it's pre-determined specs. Which is half of the truck.


Should have specified, sorry. I didn't mean on a diesel.. Unless, what I'm hearing is its the same concept on newer cars too.

in any case, this law is superfluous and asinine.. There is nothing to be gained from this... If the OEs warranty is voided the second it is altered, who gives a shit?
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Apr 22 2015 02:21pm
Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Apr 22 2015 02:40pm)
You think the gap between the ECUs of 5 years ago and today are a huge bridge? Imagine the first guy that had to figure out how to tune an EFI car the year they came out.

I feel like the companies don't realize how large of a basis there is for aftermarket builds, on almost any car...

I'd just tear the fucking thing out and put a standalone in it if its that big of a deal.. Imagine they told you that you could not, under risk of persecution, continue working on your F-body..

I can't even, its actually frustrating me thinking about it.


Yes. I own 2 gen III GM PCMs, a gen IV GM ECU, and now a gen V GM ECU. The first guy to figure out efi tuning did not have a very steep learning curve because the maps and parameters were rudimentary and mimicked a carb. The Gen III PCMs I own have about 150 tables that can be changed. Many of them are adders and multipliers for other tables. It is pretty complicated. The Gen IV stuff has around 200 tables and another 300 parameters for the automatic transmissions. The TCM is inside the transmission, which is sealed for life. If you change the wrong tables or input incorrect values you can brick the TCM and your trans is scrap. The gen V ECU is completely different. It has nearly double the tables and works on a completely different architecture. In the past, power delivery was a function of TPS voltage, atmospheric sensors, and algorithms. Now when you press the throttle pedal you aren't commanding a linear TPS voltage. The ECU uses something called driver commanded torque. It reads how much torque you are requesting at any moment and filters that through a series of complicated tables that actually have equations in their cells instead of a basic xyz map.

The few guys that have figured out GEN V tuning and really understand it have engineering degrees and are at the top of their profession. These ECUs have been out almost 2 years and GM gave several shops development products before they were released. Even the companies coding the tuning software don't fully understand every table and how it interacts with others. Many are left invisible.

It's legos vs kinex vs building a circuit board blindfolded.



I still think we should be allowed to try. When people see how complicated they are they will choose not to change things. My silverado isn't getting tuned even though i have tuning software because the risks outweigh the rewards.

This post was edited by FMX_89 on Apr 22 2015 02:22pm
Member
Posts: 21,749
Joined: Oct 2 2006
Gold: 34.36
Apr 23 2015 06:08am
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 22 2015 01:21pm)
Yes. I own 2 gen III GM PCMs, a gen IV GM ECU, and now a gen V GM ECU. The first guy to figure out efi tuning did not have a very steep learning curve because the maps and parameters were rudimentary and mimicked a carb. The Gen III PCMs I own have about 150 tables that can be changed. Many of them are adders and multipliers for other tables. It is pretty complicated. The Gen IV stuff has around 200 tables and another 300 parameters for the automatic transmissions. The TCM is inside the transmission, which is sealed for life. If you change the wrong tables or input incorrect values you can brick the TCM and your trans is scrap. The gen V ECU is completely different. It has nearly double the tables and works on a completely different architecture. In the past, power delivery was a function of TPS voltage, atmospheric sensors, and algorithms. Now when you press the throttle pedal you aren't commanding a linear TPS voltage. The ECU uses something called driver commanded torque. It reads how much torque you are requesting at any moment and filters that through a series of complicated tables that actually have equations in their cells instead of a basic xyz map.

The few guys that have figured out GEN V tuning and really understand it have engineering degrees and are at the top of their profession. These ECUs have been out almost 2 years and GM gave several shops development products before they were released. Even the companies coding the tuning software don't fully understand every table and how it interacts with others. Many are left invisible.

It's legos vs kinex vs building a circuit board blindfolded.



I still think we should be allowed to try. When people see how complicated they are they will choose not to change things. My silverado isn't getting tuned even though i have tuning software because the risks outweigh the rewards.


And to put this into perspective. GM actually has one of the EASIER ecu's to understand.

A modern 6.7L cummins can be broken down into two parts. Fuel, and Air. There are over 1800 parameters that go into the basic air/fuel "table" Things like throttle % vs actual %, Defueling, torque management (which requires a degree to understand in its own) along with a million other combinations of If this than that that play into how much fuel the motor gets and when and why it gets it. The early 6.7's I had that I tuned myself was just about unbearable to get right. I had more time on my dyno tuning the first 6.7L than I did tuning all of the 5.9Ls over the 6 years I pulled circuit. I also ran out of minuets on my cellphone's unlimited talk policy calling every one and their brother for a week during my trials and errors. Pretty sure if James at Rolling Smoke Diesel charged me for phone time i'd still be in debt today.

The days of hand held can tunes and professional tunes being close to the same price wise are LONG gone. Can tunes are getting more expensive due to the ammount of work it takes to create them but professional tuning is getting to be outrageous in price.

This all coming from the mopar/diesel side of things.
Member
Posts: 15,717
Joined: Aug 20 2007
Gold: 481.00
Apr 23 2015 06:21am
Quote (FMX_89 @ Apr 22 2015 04:21pm)
Yes. I own 2 gen III GM PCMs, a gen IV GM ECU, and now a gen V GM ECU. The first guy to figure out efi tuning did not have a very steep learning curve because the maps and parameters were rudimentary and mimicked a carb. The Gen III PCMs I own have about 150 tables that can be changed. Many of them are adders and multipliers for other tables. It is pretty complicated. The Gen IV stuff has around 200 tables and another 300 parameters for the automatic transmissions. The TCM is inside the transmission, which is sealed for life. If you change the wrong tables or input incorrect values you can brick the TCM and your trans is scrap. The gen V ECU is completely different. It has nearly double the tables and works on a completely different architecture. In the past, power delivery was a function of TPS voltage, atmospheric sensors, and algorithms. Now when you press the throttle pedal you aren't commanding a linear TPS voltage. The ECU uses something called driver commanded torque. It reads how much torque you are requesting at any moment and filters that through a series of complicated tables that actually have equations in their cells instead of a basic xyz map.

The few guys that have figured out GEN V tuning and really understand it have engineering degrees and are at the top of their profession. These ECUs have been out almost 2 years and GM gave several shops development products before they were released. Even the companies coding the tuning software don't fully understand every table and how it interacts with others. Many are left invisible.

It's legos vs kinex vs building a circuit board blindfolded.



I still think we should be allowed to try. When people see how complicated they are they will choose not to change things. My silverado isn't getting tuned even though i have tuning software because the risks outweigh the rewards.


so youre saying i cant just do an eprom flash on a 2014 camarow what gives GM is a crap company wheres my odb at


but for real, i blew my trans ams 305 tpi cause i tried tuning it, motor lasted about 2 weeks on the chip, granted i was 17, but yolo

This post was edited by t9x on Apr 23 2015 06:23am
Member
Posts: 17,247
Joined: Oct 19 2007
Gold: 484.02
Apr 23 2015 11:34am
Quote (t9x @ Apr 23 2015 07:21am)
so youre saying i cant just do an eprom flash on a 2014 camarow what gives GM is a crap company wheres my odb at


but for real, i blew my trans ams 305 tpi cause i tried tuning it, motor lasted about 2 weeks on the chip, granted i was 17, but yolo


A 2014 camaro is Gen IV. Still very tunable but not as forgiving to flash the automatic if you don't know what you are doing. The gen V engines are the really complicated ones.
Member
Posts: 31,917
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,868.50
Apr 23 2015 04:05pm
You'll never go to jail for working on your car in America. At the most you may void the warranty and not get repairs done for free by a dealership.
Member
Posts: 18,699
Joined: Apr 24 2007
Gold: 0.00
Apr 23 2015 04:10pm
Quote (said_aouita @ Apr 23 2015 10:05pm)
You'll never go to jail for working on your car in America. At the most you may void the warranty and not get repairs done for free by a dealership.


Already happens bruh
Member
Posts: 31,917
Joined: Oct 25 2005
Gold: 3,868.50
Apr 23 2015 05:26pm
Quote (ozzyarmy3 @ Apr 23 2015 05:10pm)
Already happens bruh


What did they do to their car that got them thrown in jail?
Go Back To Motor Sports & Cars Topic List
Prev123Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll