Ok so I'm buying a new car this week.
2007 chevy Impala 3.5l 127k KM.
Ex police car, not the interceptor but the inspectors car so it's not a 3.9l and there's nothing modified on the vehicle.
Had no lights installed on it no holes in the dash for a computer etc.
SUPER clean no rust what so ever.
3000$ Canadian.

I can post pictures once it's officially in my name the guy has three pics that just looks ok.

But now my actual question is.
Is it a bad idea to dual exhaust this car?
I was thinking resignator delete, add dual thrusher mufflers and some tips unsure on the tips yet.
Probably add a cold air intake too.

It's a bad idea to buy this car

I disagree. Impala are decent vehicles my experience.

One of my current vehicles is a 2011 Impala with the 3.5

I say def go for it OP, 3k is cheap af.

It's a very good price cheapest for a descent one.
And it's a government vehicle which usually means it had very good maintenance and often because government vehicles never have insurance, it would cost to much.
I also had a impala before and loved it 04 impala SS and it had resignator delete dual thrusher with stock tips but the SS tips are sexy already.

The fuck did I just read.?

Do you have anything to say?
If not get out.

Sure, you're retarded.

What does prior insurance have anything to do with anything?
What is a resignator? Do you mean resonator?
What the shit is a dual thrusher? It sounds like you're word vomiting, it's called thrush exhaust, and it's nothing to brag about

You should educate yourself on cars before you buy one.

There is nothing to brag about in this thread Im simply asking if it's a good idea to dual exhaust a 3.5l.
To use thrush welded mufflers big deal.
If you don't approve just say so and get out.

You'd be surprised with the beatings government vehicles get, especially police vehicles.

but go for it, lol.

Keep track of your push rods when doin the lower intake lol.

Gl