Quote (ride686 @ Aug 31 2013 05:36pm)

I gotta ask, why go this far with this car? I can kind of understand the car stock, but when you go to this length it just stops making sense to do imo. That said, they aren't bad to drive. I'd never buy one, nor would I buy any Mazda with how bad they rust with the salt around here, but they are a decent drive.

Quote (kyte @ Aug 31 2013 07:38pm)

because near 500WHP = torquesteer. and I love that shit.

nah idk, you know how the car scene is. you buy one part and you never stop. I love the platform. no one expects to hear an external wastegate coming from a "mazda 3 with orange rims"

Quote (justin_618 @ Aug 31 2013 08:41pm)

dyno sheet or no where near 500

Quote (justin_618 @ Aug 31 2013 05:41pm)

dyno sheet or no where near 500

Quote (justin_618 @ Aug 31 2013 05:55pm)

what fuel did you run to make that i assume 93 pump. and also im surprised most people just claim to have XX number for hp and wont back it up

Quote (kyte @ Aug 31 2013 08:51pm)

http://s10.postimg.org/d9o7sxlp5/dyno.jpg

meh I have nothing to prove to any of you but meh here...

done in Colorado with a 1.24 correction factor due to 6500 ft elevation

mod list (the parts that matter anyways):


GTX3076r
TIAL MVS EWG
Cobb AccessPort
CPE Turbo Inlet Pipe
SSP Short Ram Intake
SSP EGR Delete
PNP Intake Manifold
Turbosmart 50/50 BOV
Corksport TMIC
Bosch 3bar w/ quick harness 
CNT Catted Downpipe
CorkSport Catback Exhaust
AutoTech Fuel Pump Internals
Grimmspeed 3port
NGK Plugs
JBR Trilogy motor mounts Mounts 80 Duro
JBR OCC Stage II
Full Race Exhaust Mani

Quote (kyte @ Aug 31 2013 07:57pm)

I was on 91 pump (all Colorado has to offer) and a mix with 35% ethanol (our fuel systems cant handle 100% e85)

on a pure 91 tune I would be happy to be in the low 400's