Car Audio - Topic

Bankai

Member

Posts: 28,434

Joined: Mar 6 2007

Gold: 0.00

Trader: Mediator

#41

Mar 7 2012 11:37pm

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 7 2012 10:31pm)

just use the outside pairs exactly how that picture shows. most amps only allow for that wiring configuration.

okay cool
and it says 200RMS per channel bridged, so that would be even better

Subwoofer

Member

Posts: 32,985

Joined: Mar 17 2005

Gold: 6.00

#42

Mar 7 2012 11:39pm

Quote (Bankai @ Mar 8 2012 12:37am)

okay cool
and it says 200RMS per channel bridged, so that would be even better

oh maybe not. hmm just realized the power rating was different than i thought lol.

This post was edited by Subwoofer on Mar 7 2012 11:40pm

Bankai

Member

Posts: 28,434

Joined: Mar 6 2007

Gold: 0.00

Trader: Mediator

#43

Mar 7 2012 11:42pm

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 7 2012 10:39pm)

oh maybe not. hmm just realized the power rating was different than i thought lol.

the speakers say a 300watt peak max, so it should be good to go

Subwoofer

Member

Posts: 32,985

Joined: Mar 17 2005

Gold: 6.00

#44

Mar 7 2012 11:45pm

Quote (Bankai @ Mar 8 2012 12:42am)

the speakers say a 300watt peak max, so it should be good to go

nah thats going to be too much power. peak is pretty useless spec.

http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p_27707_MB_Quart_FX260.aspx bridged will be better.

Bankai

Member

Posts: 28,434

Joined: Mar 6 2007

Gold: 0.00

Trader: Mediator

#45

Mar 8 2012 12:00am

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 7 2012 10:45pm)

nah thats going to be too much power. peak is pretty useless spec.

http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p27707MBQuartFX260.aspx bridged will be better.

well it has 4x 100watt channel configuration it says? or does it need to be bridged since it has tweeters?

guessing since their 4ohm speakers it'll only get the 50watts though huh?

the one you just linked just says 1x for the bridged, but i can't really tell

This post was edited by Bankai on Mar 8 2012 12:02am

Subwoofer

Member

Posts: 32,985

Joined: Mar 17 2005

Gold: 6.00

#46

Mar 8 2012 12:24am

Quote (Bankai @ Mar 8 2012 01:00am)

you will run your positives and negatives together into 1 set of wires. when you do this bridged it will give you 240 watts and then each speaker will get half of that.

not really sure how its going to turn out sound quality wise but you can always just run them@60rms per. wont be perfect but its a hell of a lot better than 10rms per.

Bankai

Member

Posts: 28,434

Joined: Mar 6 2007

Gold: 0.00

Trader: Mediator

#47

Mar 8 2012 12:27am

these any good? or the brand power acoustik?
http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p_23919_Hifonics_HFi1002.aspx ( 100watts per channel )
http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p_19362_Orion_CO6002.aspx ( 100watts per channel )
http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p_30588_Kenwood_KAC-7205RB.aspx ( 170watts per channel )

Subwoofer

Member

Posts: 32,985

Joined: Mar 17 2005

Gold: 6.00

#48

Mar 8 2012 12:33am

both the kenwood and orion have fairly bad distortion ratings.

you don't want to go much more than 100rms to them. more than that and you risk blowing them pretty easily.

the hifonics is an okay choice. didnt see it because its discontinued.

Bankai

Member

Posts: 28,434

Joined: Mar 6 2007

Gold: 0.00

Trader: Mediator

#49

Mar 8 2012 12:37am

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 7 2012 11:33pm)

so if i get the HiFonics one, i would just run the tweeters/mid on one channel and other tweeter/mid to 2nd channel? giving 100watts each

Subwoofer

Member

Posts: 32,985

Joined: Mar 17 2005

Gold: 6.00

#50

Mar 8 2012 12:41am

Quote (Bankai @ Mar 8 2012 01:37am)

so if i get the HiFonics one, i would just run the tweeters/mid on one channel and other tweeter/mid to 2nd channel? giving 100watts each

yep. its probably going to be more around 80-85rms in reality though. hifonics doesn't overrate their stuff a ton but they do some.

This post was edited by Subwoofer on Mar 8 2012 12:41am

Go Back To Car Audio Topic List