Quote (kookymunsta309 @ Mar 2 2012 02:34pm)

Ive heard a lanzar opti 6000d sounded good

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 3 2012 01:51am)

their optidrice line is about the only non shit they have.

Quote (Hellish Orc @ Mar 2 2012 02:09pm)

Please back up your stupidity, because $50 lanzars do just as much as your beloved Type R's bro, the Max Pro's are known to be decent for the price. and the Lanzar Opti33d's are gfg subwoofers too great power handling for the price.




let me know when Dual makes a $50 subwoofer that's about the same as a Type R and let me know when dual makes a 2-3krms subwoofer for $250.

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 3 2012 01:04am)

lol ya almost all of their shit is like that to. $50 sub with 1500-2k rms ratings sound legit.

lanzar has very few things i would even consider entry level. the rest is just made up spec crap.

Quote (Avoid @ Mar 3 2012 12:11am)

My friend had a lanzar 3000 amp and we fried it in a heartbeat.

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 3 2012 08:36am)

their optidrive amps are cea-2006 compliant iirc.

Quote (Avoid @ Mar 3 2012 06:00am)

Yes because $100 lanzar amps actually produce 3k rms, right?

I mean for gods sake, the only place that sells them are pawn shops.

Quote (Hellish Orc @ Mar 3 2012 04:12am)

I ran one

Yes and a guy that thinks an AP1500.1D does 1800w is credible for setting up amplifiers... I used an Opti @ .5 daily with stock electrical and it didnt fry anything... I never said they did rated I said they did near rated, power/watts the Opti subs are great. I wouldnt expect a Rockford/Alpine fan to understand

Quote (Subwoofer @ Mar 3 2012 09:17am)

it was most likely one of the heritage line or something. lanzar thrives of selling their junk lines and it really kills the rep of their okay stuff. i'd be interested how their current optidrive subs do but lanzar is a turn off just because even if it was good i'd have to defend it everytime someone seen it lol.