gotta have lows, to drown your highs lol

Probably because they don't know to tune shit right lol ever thought of that? I've never blown a door speaker in my life.



Ugh once again you make up stupid shit to make your statements seem true, there's nothing at all wrong with using components like the AQ's , 3 ways are garbage 99% of the time and Lanzar being better?! lmfao! Why dont' you keep your cock sucker shut instead of spewing out stupid information you THINK is true. Besides he can buy a pair of tweeters for like $20 that would fit the bill not that he needs them, I think it's cute when subwoofer tries to act like he knows shit

my friend uses 2 sets of AQ6.5's and they sound better then my 2-ways and cost less...




Nah kids just a crybaby avoid dick rider that won't get off my dick, hes upset cause I know more than him D:





Coming from a guy that thinks SQ is an AP/Crunch amp and 6 low-end JL door speakers o.O I bet you think coaxals are better than components right?

This post was edited by Hellish Orc on Feb 20 2012 09:18am

components=mid+high you retard.

explain how a midwoofer with no tweeter is a 2 way.

i feel sorry for everyone that has to deal with your stupidity face to face.

When did I once say it was a 2way do you EVER read ANYTHING but your own stupid posts? Have you ever even heard AQ midrange speakers? Not everything needs tweeters. I said those sound better than my more expensive 3-ways with a tweeters on crossovers. Read the description:
"Enter the AQ-PA-6.5 engineered for high output, extended range and crisp, clean vocals and you have the missing piece for a well balanced, SQL system." It's not a mid "woofer" it's a mid-range speaker a mid-woofer would be like an 8" shallow mount in your doors you obviously have no clue.

Besides anyone who's as big of a fan of AQ as you should be avoided... AQ brand has been dogshit this year raising all of their prices and the shipping is twice as expensive now. The SQ on them is terrible and they barely do over-rated. The PA6.5's are like their last good product for the price and you don't even back it, so why are you an AQ fan again? obviously they suggest using tweeters for high-range but it's not needed and tons of people run mid-range setups just fine if you set them up properly.

Here let's suggest these:
http://www.amazon.com/Pioneer-TS-G1643R-6-5-Inch-2-Way-Speakers/dp/B002KOME7G/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1329751571&sr=8-1

because they have a tweeter and 90db sensitivity sounds like a plan huh?

This post was edited by Hellish Orc on Feb 20 2012 09:29am

"The AQ-PA-6.5 is a high output midwoofer designed to get loud and sound clear."

says its a midwoofer right there on the spec page. you have no idea what makes a midbass and a midrange different so stop trying to pretend size changes its set frequency response.

when you said "there's nothing at all wrong with using components like the AQ's,3 ways are garbage" you implied that the midwoofer you linked was a 2 way.

its hilarious you don't know the difference between sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio. gtfo before i die laughing.

It's still technically not a mid-woofer reqaurdless. and no I deffinatly DID NOT say they were 2 ways nor did I imply it so stop making shit up. It's funny you think sensitivity and signal-to-noise mean everything and I hope you die from laughing one less stupid person trolling me with no life may I ask subwoofer what YOU run for a setup? since you're such an SQ audiophile I would like some ideas on what a REAL audiophile uses?

and if you make some BS claim I want pictures/videos because honestly I think you're a lamer that runs xplodes and calls himself an audiophile.

FYI: Without crossovers or a good headunit any door speaker non-amped is not going to have good range and its going to sound like dog shit. You offering 3-way JL's doesn't back up your shit any better lol those primes are junk and always have been. Also there are a ton of tweeters you can get for $20 a pair like Selenium's if he's not satisfied with his high-end.

This post was edited by Hellish Orc on Feb 20 2012 09:45am

sensitivity and stn ratio are important specifications and you not knowing how important they are just adds to the mountain of proof that you are a failure at car audio.

if you knew what implied meant you would know i was absolutely right.

i could run my music through some ghetto rigged baby monitors and d batteries and it wouldn't change the fact i will continue to know vastly more about car audio than you.

Ugh so much fail comes from you man, so much fail... IF you knew what implied meant you would realize that you're absolutely stupid. and man you don't run shit do you? lol that's funny, another internet board follower that spews out everything he hears should have known have you EVER even owned an AQ product to be a fanboy like you are? I bet in 10 years you still won't even know half what I know even if you read something new everyday haha, you're still a small fry in a big game dude.

2 facts #1: I bet you can't and never have been louder than me, and #2 I bet you're nowhere as clean as my setup is... Like avoid just a dude that reads shit online and acts like he knows.

On the internet they say flex is bad, when my buddy put deadner in his truck he lost db's. Theres a lot of shit that they say online that's only half true and real world testing is the only truth.

This post was edited by Hellish Orc on Feb 20 2012 09:54am

IF you're so smart how do you mathematically calculate the resonant freq of a vehicle and the impedance rise?

2 facts. you have an iq well below 100 and you will die of aids because you thought it was made up to scare you.

in 10 years i definitely wont' know half of what you know about be a mentally challenged meth addict with multiple stds, no teeth, living on the street.