Quote (BlackKnightsOfFistingPower @ Sep 13 2010 02:55pm)
I think the rule has it's downfall like all other rules. I mean if it goes to 6-6, what's the difference between that an 9-9? Either player has yet to break the other's, but you've added even more time onto that match that gives the winner even less chance to win next round due to being tired. I also think it can cause matches with stronger servers to be rewarded kind of unfairly(only need to get a couple lucky points against your opponents serve, then rock your own in to win a match that was very closely contested) I don't think there's an easy resolution, but to have the rule set as Wimbledon does now is just plain ridiculous in my opinion.
But as he said before, most matches dont ge that far anyway.
So when a match does get that far, it means it has been a good match.
I just dont beleive there should be a 66 tiebreaker, but maybe for first few rounds of matches,m but in later rounds like quarters on, it shoulkd be lengthend to a higher limit, as the players will have bigger breaks in between matches