Ah It wasn't that exciting come on.. Federer won like all his service games on love. Federer Nadal was far better I think.

isner/mahut >

He's not that good

all he can do is serve
apart from that he's nothing but a top 50 player, really mediocre

Did you think that was exciting or boring? It took way too log and nobody cared about it after 20-20 . The match wasn't even that important.. was like a third round.

if he has a simply above average serve hes probably 15-20

average = top 50

liability = maybe top 75-100

ya, 2nd round, and i'm pretty sure we all knew as the 5th set dragged on that the winner was probably going to get slapped around in the next round (and then de bakker delivered)

i think the 5th set at every slam should need to be 12-12 in order to enter a breaker, and maybe make it optional so as both people need to agree one way or another and it if it's a split decision make it a coin flip or something

YAr
I dont like the us open where it goes straight into a tiebreak.
should atlesast wait a few games

conclusion to ferrer/verdaso was straight stupid, although entertaining

e/ same goes for djokovic/stepanek back in 07

This post was edited by 987 on Sep 10 2010 05:47am

tennis has a sub-forum? awesome