Quote (Cadillac @ Dec 18 2010 06:12pm)

Quote (Clydeowns @ Dec 18 2010 04:27pm)

Lol, settle down nerds

1v1 mid proves nothing.

now go do something productive.

also 1v1 mid = no jungle

the rules are clear.

jungle is forfeit automatically.

and if you dont win vs a soraka as heimer then you should prob uninstall l0l

Quote (cooper888 @ 18 Dec 2010 19:30)

THIS ISNT ARAM

Quote (cooper888 @ Dec 18 2010 03:30pm)

THIS ISNT ARAM

Quote (killachmy @ Dec 18 2010 07:07am)

you are the one welching

you said mid only and you left mid and went to jungle

after you said mid only to me i picked soraka for
1. lols
2. lols
3. can stay in lane a while
otherwise i would have picked heimer because obvious choice with blue buff

send account and pw or forever welcher

Quote (killachmy @ Dec 18 2010 02:59pm)

Cher picks heimer with teleport and fortify

KillaChmy picks soraka with heal and exhaust

Cher breaks her own rule of no leaving middle lane 3 times to get blue buff
only reason she won

i killed her too
with soraka... O_O


killachmy wins by default because cher forfeits by breaking her own rule

had she not had blue buff all game i woulda won ez cause i can outlast her in the lane while not losing tower health
also cher used most OP champ for 1v1 tower push and killachmy used most UP champ

cher still died to killachmy

Quote (Clydeowns @ Dec 18 2010 04:32pm)

From the details handed to me, it was agreed upon that both the summoners were doing a 1v1 mid.

This was agreed to by both summoners, therefor they agreed upon the 1v1 mid rules of :

Mid only
No jungle

Push to nexus = win
Tower = win
Firstblood = win

^ varying on what mode.

jungle would be an automatic unfair advantage because certain heroes can do the jungle better.

which brings me back to my point of why "1v1 mid" doesn't prove shit